On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:54:07PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I don't understand where you see jumps?
bool BufferView::Pimpl::dispatch(FuncRequest const & ev_in)
{
[...]
default:
return bv_->getLyXText()->dispatch(FuncRequest(ev, bv_));
} // end of switch
}
Andre Poenitz wrote:
The hierarchy should be something like
LyXFunc
|
BufferView
|
Buffer
|
OutermostText [And this should go if everything is an inset]
|
Insets
and we should walk it bottom-up. Currently we have some strange combination
of guessing jumps down (
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 12:54 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The innermost level that knows to handle an event should handle it. Ideally
> there should not be (much|any) magical guessing who is responsible.
>
> The hierarchy should be something like
>
> LyXFunc
>
> BufferView
>
> Buffer
>
> Ou
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 11:16:39AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> André, as localDispatch is yours,
Not really.
> perhaps you can help me with this problem. It's come up because I'm
> starting to deal with insets which have a dialog but which are also
> editable.
>
> Inset::localDispatch is call
André, as localDispatch is yours, perhaps you can help me with this problem.
It's come up because I'm starting to deal with insets which have a dialog
but which are also editable.
Inset::localDispatch is called from LyXFunc::dispatch (below). If this fails
then the LFUN is passed to BufferView:
