On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 01:59:47PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Lacking any opinion on this matter, I opted for solution 2, but
> > instead of moving the glyph I simply remapped it to an unused
> > position in order to maintain compatibility with the TeX font.
>
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Jürgen, what about branch?
You can read my mind :-)
Jürgen
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Lacking any opinion on this matter, I opted for solution 2, but
> instead of moving the glyph I simply remapped it to an unused
> position in order to maintain compatibility with the TeX font.
This should also be done for branch, right?
Jürgen
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 05:37:46PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 05:23:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > For screen representation of integrals, LyX uses two different fonts
> > leading to an inconsistent look. See the attached integrals.lyx.
> >
> > There's
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 05:23:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> For screen representation of integrals, LyX uses two different fonts
> leading to an inconsistent look. See the attached integrals.lyx.
>
> There's already in place the infrastructure for using the integrals
> in the esint font,
For screen representation of integrals, LyX uses two different fonts
leading to an inconsistent look. See the attached integrals.lyx.
There's already in place the infrastructure for using the integrals
in the esint font, and some time ago I built a ttf version of this
font (I am attching it here).
