On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:10:40PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Maybe a more detailed explanation can be given in the release notes,
> which can be referenced in the message. Otherwise, do as you think it
> best fits.
Makes sense. I will propose a patch. In the message I will put something
l
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 02:03:34PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 08:45:45PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I'm interested in the experience of users who already added
> > -shell-escape to their converters and will be using the same preferences
> > file after they upgrad
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 08:45:45PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I'm interested in the experience of users who already added
> -shell-escape to their converters and will be using the same preferences
> file after they upgrade to LyX 2.3.x. When such a user compiles any .lyx
> file, they will get
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:12:28PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 31/08/2017 02:45, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > feature, first remove the -shell-escape option from the global
> > converter by going to Preferences > file handling > converters,
> > removing "-shell-escape" from th
On 31/08/2017 02:45, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
feature, first remove the -shell-escape option from the global
converter by going to Preferences > file handling > converters,
removing "-shell-escape" from the corresponding converter, and
clicking on "Modify" and then "Save".
Any
I'm interested in the experience of users who already added
-shell-escape to their converters and will be using the same preferences
file after they upgrade to LyX 2.3.x. When such a user compiles any .lyx
file, they will get the following message:
The following LaTeX backend has been configur
