On Thursday 24 July 2008 13:49:53 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> so i'm afraid that documenting the format means reading source code; there
> won't be any specification debate.
It is a little bit more than that. Lars had a DTD to describe the LyX XML
format.
We could update the DTD with each file version.
Steve Litt wrote:
On Thursday 24 July 2008 08:49, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
so i'm afraid that documenting the format means reading source code; there
won't be any specification debate.
I'm pretty sure I have LyX-1.5.3 source hanging around. What would be a good
On Thursday 24 July 2008 08:49, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
> so i'm afraid that documenting the format means reading source code; there
> won't be any specification debate.
I'm pretty sure I have LyX-1.5.3 source hanging around. What would be a good
plan for learning it? What source
Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm Steve Litt, a regular on the user's list. Since 2001, all my books have
> been written in LyX.
>
> I'm not a LyX developer. Believe me, you guys wouldn't want to work with my
> C++ code.
>
> What brings me here is an interest, from a user point of view, in t
Hi all,
I'm Steve Litt, a regular on the user's list. Since 2001, all my books have
been written in LyX.
I'm not a LyX developer. Believe me, you guys wouldn't want to work with my
C++ code.
What brings me here is an interest, from a user point of view, in the upcoming
XML native format. This
