On 01/03/2015 12:03 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
(1) Starred layouts always have LabelType No_Label
(2) Starred layouts are in Category Unnumbered
(3) Starred layouts have no LabelCounter
I'd say that (3) is the right one.
However, it is still ambiguous. What if we
On 01/03/2015 11:57 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
commit b9f48eb945028d835ee93936a48b5fe611c6e4f9
Author: Richard Heck
Date: Fri May 10 13:17:47 2013 -0400
Fix bug #8666. Parts should have toclevel -1.
A lot of this involves removing toclevel tags. They got
introduced
b
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > (1) Starred layouts always have LabelType No_Label
> > (2) Starred layouts are in Category Unnumbered
> > (3) Starred layouts have no LabelCounter
>
> I'd say that (3) is the right one.
However, it is still ambiguous. What if we have different section types with a
Richard Heck wrote:
>>> commit b9f48eb945028d835ee93936a48b5fe611c6e4f9
>>> Author: Richard Heck
>>> Date: Fri May 10 13:17:47 2013 -0400
>>>
>>> Fix bug #8666. Parts should have toclevel -1.
>>> A lot of this involves removing toclevel tags. They got
>>> introduced
>>> by the automatic
Le 03/01/2015 17:48, Richard Heck a écrit :
It's the comparison between *label types* that fails for standard book.
There, Parts have label type Static, whereas Chapters have label type
Above. In Koma book, they are both Static.
LabelType should be split between visual type and functional type.
On 01/02/2015 05:42 PM, aparsloe wrote:
On 3/01/2015 10:34 a.m., Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
aparsloe wrote:
The buttons at the bottom of the Outline pane which increase or
decrease
the depth of the heading containing the cursor don't work as they
should on
my system for chapters a
