> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> I agree since the changes were collateral. But this was
Jose'> really an imaginative bug, for sure. :-)
Sure. "Lyx, only the best bugs!" has been my motto for some time.
JMarc
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 15:06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Jose'> FWIW I think that we (no, not Lars) and not Jean-Marc should
> Jose'> be those to blame.
>
> What do you mean? Did you do something wrong recently? You can tell us
> everything you know... We are not here to judge your acti
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> On Wednesday 11 August 2004 14:35, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> That's to make sure that the tar.gz has not been changed on
>> ftp.lyx.org by some nasty pirate. One can put amusing trojans in
>> the configure script, for example.
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 14:35, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> That's to make sure that the tar.gz has not been changed on
> ftp.lyx.org by some nasty pirate. One can put amusing trojans in the
> configure script, for example.
Like erasing the /dev/null? ;-)
For those with a small memory
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> OK. And what about signing our packages in similar fashion to
Angus> the FSF? Actually, I never really understood what this
Angus> achieves.
That's to make sure that the tar.gz has not been changed on
ftp.lyx.org by some nasty pira
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> It would make sense to have such checksums for the tar files
> Angus> though, don't you think?
>
> Thats's more... Oops, I already used this argument.
>
> But seriously, did we have many people complain about broken
> downloads? If the download is corrupted, g
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Apparently not. The md5sum is automatically included in the rpm
Angus> file and is checked by the rpm tool before it does anything
Angus> else.
Angus> It would make sense to have such checksums for the tar files
Angus> though, don'
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Angus> I've just received this response from a user trying to extract
> Angus> the rpm for RH9. Is the rpm corrupt?
>
> I am the one who made it, and I just tried to install the rpm that I
> got fr
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I've just received this response from a user trying to extract
Angus> the rpm for RH9. Is the rpm corrupt?
I am the one who made it, and I just tried to install the rpm that I
got from ftp.lyx.org. It just worked.
Angus> As an asi
On poniedziaÅek 09 sierpieÅ 2004 09:54 am, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I've just received this response from a user trying to extract the rpm
> for RH9. Is the rpm corrupt?
Doesn't seem so.
> As an aside, why don't we also post .md5sum files containing the
Because rpm does the hash checking already.
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I've just received this response from a user trying to extract the rpm
| for RH9. Is the rpm corrupt?
>
| As an aside, why don't we also post .md5sum files containing the
| output of md5sum so that users can verify that they have downloaded
| the file
I've just received this response from a user trying to extract the rpm
for RH9. Is the rpm corrupt?
As an aside, why don't we also post .md5sum files containing the
output of md5sum so that users can verify that they have downloaded
the file correctly?
Angus
On Monday 09 August 2004 3:45 pm,
12 matches
Mail list logo
