On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Dekel Tsur wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 09:44:48AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> > > On 17 Aug 2000, Miyata Shigeru wrote:
> > >
> > > > Lastly for linear transform of a graphic buffer of X, we may adopt libart
> > > > http://www.levie
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Imagemagick also support transformation (e.g. convert -rotate 30),
> and it can convert from eps to any format (using gs).
> It also include a shared library (libmagick).
> I'm not sure how useful it is for your purposes, but I'll leave it to you to
> do t
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 09:44:48AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> > On 17 Aug 2000, Miyata Shigeru wrote:
> >
> > > Lastly for linear transform of a graphic buffer of X, we may adopt libart
> > > http://www.levien.com/libart/
> >
> > I'll check it out too, however I was
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 09:44:48AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> On 17 Aug 2000, Miyata Shigeru wrote:
>
> > Lastly for linear transform of a graphic buffer of X, we may adopt libart
> > http://www.levien.com/libart/
>
> I'll check it out too, however I was told to avoid adding dependencie
On 17 Aug 2000, Miyata Shigeru wrote:
> Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The reason for the LyXImage is to be a container of the native image data
> > structure that is to be used in Painter. What I want is to have
> > PainterBase::image() that receives LyXImage and draws it on the s
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that we do not understand each other.
Probably.
> The reason for the LyXImage is to be a container of the native image data
> structure that is to be used in Painter. What I want is to have
> PainterBase::image() that receives LyXImage and draws
On 17 Aug 2000, Miyata Shigeru wrote:
> Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've added a method to PainterBase and Painter, called image() which is
> > equivalent to pixmap() but gets a LyXImage const *, the Painter::image()
> > actually gets the Pixmap out of the LyXImage and calls Pai
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've added a method to PainterBase and Painter, called image() which is
> equivalent to pixmap() but gets a LyXImage const *, the Painter::image()
> actually gets the Pixmap out of the LyXImage and calls Painter::pixmap(),
> I didn't remove Painter::pixmap
I've been trying to create a solution to the GUII pixmaps, that is the
long term independence, so as to allow a native Windows port for example.
The solution I came up with is to replace Pixmap with a class LyXImage
that is defined in src/frontends/support/ and a factory class
LyXImageFa
