Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Ok, but where is the combox deleted then?
| >
| > every "new" must have a "delete".
| >
| > And why have this as a pointer in FormCharacter? It seems that it
| > could just be a regular object.
|
| Sorry guys, I am out of silly `solutions', it is time
> Ok, but where is the combox deleted then?
>
> every "new" must have a "delete".
>
> And why have this as a pointer in FormCharacter? It seems that it
> could just be a regular object.
Sorry guys, I am out of silly `solutions', it is time for Combox-man or
xform-man to save the world...Ed.
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
|
| I think that the problem in the character form is the following:
|
| I thought that Combox was a native xforms object but it is in fact a class
| defined/declared in ./src/combox.[Ch]. This class takes care of the
| destruction of the Combox.
On Tuesday 27 February 2001 08:47, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> I think that the problem in the character form is the following:
>
> I thought that Combox was a native xforms object but it is in fact a class
> defined/declared in ./src/combox.[Ch]. This class takes care of the
> destructio
Hi,
I think that the problem in the character form is the following:
I thought that Combox was a native xforms object but it is in fact a class
defined/declared in ./src/combox.[Ch]. This class takes care of the
destruction of the Combox. The delete Combox in the destructor in
FormCharacter s
