Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> What would be nice would be a way of telling Qt to ensure that
> Angus> the Graphics dialog remained on top of the main LyX window when
> Angus> the Alert pops up, so that the Alert is on top of the Graphics
> Angus> dialog is on top of the main window. Currentl
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> What would be nice would be a way of telling Qt to ensure that
Angus> the Graphics dialog remained on top of the main LyX window when
Angus> the Alert pops up, so that the Alert is on top of the Graphics
Angus> dialog is on top of t
Angus Leeming wrote:
> M, but the Alert provides the user with non-intuitive information and
> it pops up once only. (I think it should stay in other words.)
I understand the reasons for having the Alert, therefore I said "maybe" :-)
> What would be nice would be a way of telling Qt to ensur
Georg Baum wrote:
>> Question is, how does the interface "feel" to you?
>
> Without looking at the code: It feels good! Maybe we can even drop the
> Alert? This would be consistent with the length validators that we
> already have. The drawback of the Alert is that it can pop up and get
> focus wh
Am Donnerstag, 21. April 2005 18:38 schrieb Angus Leeming:
> Question is, how does the interface "feel" to you?
Without looking at the code: It feels good! Maybe we can even drop the
Alert? This would be consistent with the length validators that we
already have. The drawback of the Alert is th
The attached file looks big but much of that is removal of cruft; there
were 5 separate and identical unsignedLengthValidator functions in
anonymous namespaces in the qt frontend :)
The patch:
* removes the checks for invalid file names from the file browsers.
* renames qt2/lengthvalidator.[Ch] as
