Re: FoilTeX NOT in teTeX-1.0

1999-06-08 Thread mressler
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Send modifications to me if you want. Also, if you feel like > re-reading the file and changing its organization, it would be > appreicated. I feel it is not very clear, but I do not know what to do > about it (is the CTAN discussion clear enough?

Re: FoilTeX NOT in teTeX-1.0

1999-06-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Mike" == mressler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Mike> The following came through the teTeX mailing list. It will Mike> affect us since FoilTeX is one of the common default packages. I Mi

Re: FoilTeX NOT in teTeX-1.0

1999-06-08 Thread mressler
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Mike> The following came through the teTeX mailing list. It will > Mike> affect us since FoilTeX is one of the common default packages. I > Mike> will add a note to this effect in the LyX docs (pr

Re: FoilTeX NOT in teTeX-1.0

1999-06-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> The following came through the teTeX mailing list. It will Mike> affect us since FoilTeX is one of the common default packages. I Mike> will add a note to this effect in the LyX docs (presumably Mike> Extended) in the next couple of days. The b

FoilTeX NOT in teTeX-1.0

1999-06-07 Thread mressler
The following came through the teTeX mailing list. It will affect us since FoilTeX is one of the common default packages. I will add a note to this effect in the LyX docs (presumably Extended) in the next couple of days. Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 7