Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Stefan, could you please update your patch with Andre's comment?
Here it is.
Thanks. I also need a log for the SVN commit.
Here it is:
Locking counter added to MacroData: it is increased before
drawing/metric calculations and decreased aft
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Stefan, could you please update your patch with Andre's comment?
Here it is.
Thanks. I also need a log for the SVN commit.
Here it is:
Locking counter added to MacroData: it is increased before drawing/
metric calculations and decreased afterwards in InsetMathMacro
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Stefan, could you please update your patch with Andre's comment?
Here it is.
Thanks. I also need a log for the SVN commit.
Abdel.
Stefan, could you please update your patch with Andre's comment?
Here it is.
Stefan
recursivemacros.patch
Description: Binary data
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:53:44PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Here is a proposal to fix the crash when you try to define macros with
self references, i.e. by using \foo inside of the definition of \foo
itself (or by any other definitiona
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:59:40PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> I was thinking about tracking the dependency graph of used macros in
> a macro definition and look for loops. Then return a harmless
> MathMacro with some error string in that case. But that would
> probably be much more com
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:53:44PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >Here is a proposal to fix the crash when you try to define macros with
> >self references, i.e. by using \foo inside of the definition of \foo
> >itself (or by any other definitional loop):
Am 16.04.2007 um 16:53 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Here is a proposal to fix the crash when you try to define macros
with self references, i.e. by using \foo inside of the definition
of \foo itself (or by any other definitional loop):
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Here is a proposal to fix the crash when you try to define macros with
self references, i.e. by using \foo inside of the definition of \foo
itself (or by any other definitional loop):
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/attachment.cgi?id=1548&action=view
It basically impl
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Here is a proposal to fix the crash when you try to define macros with
self references, i.e. by using \foo inside of the definition of \foo
itself (or by any other definitional loop):
Hello Stephan,
Sorry I can't comment on your patch (cause I am totally ignoran
Hi!
Here is a proposal to fix the crash when you try to define macros
with self references, i.e. by using \foo inside of the definition of
\foo itself (or by any other definitional loop):
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/attachment.cgi?id=1548&action=view
It basically implements a locking counter
I have just checked in a fix to the seggfault problem . At least I am
not able to make Lyx segfault in my simplistic testes anymore. So if
you earlier were able to make LyX seffault easy do the same now and
report the status.
The error I fixed were in LyXText::Backspace where we deleted a
lyxpar
12 matches
Mail list logo
