On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:18:53AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I am using svn revision 26051 as the base for the first candidate to be
> > RC1.
> >
> > As usual the sources packages can be found here:
> > http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6
> >
> > If there are no
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just reported two bugs to bugzilla which are confirmed on both Linux and
> WinXP. 5132+5133
>
> Especially the first one might interest you, because it is a bug in the
> Edit Menu, which might
ebea5 in QMenuBarPrivate::popupAction (this=0x14580c0,
Vincent
Van: Pavel Sanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: di 5-8-2008 16:46
Aan: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Onderwerp: Re: First candidate to rc1
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> after applying changes i
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
if you are happy with backtraces without recipy, i'll launch
lyx under dbg from now :)
You should *always* do that!
next crash at quiting lyx:
OK, I guess I can fix that one. I'll try anyway.
Abdel.
Program received si
Pavel Sanda wrote:
and yes i have debug symbols linked. there seems to be something really nasty
in the code when we get stack like this.
Yes, an invalid pointer or something...
now i got this crash when clicking on 'Edit'
menu, so maybe cut/paste code for checking clipboard is in play.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> if you are happy with backtraces without recipy, i'll launch
>> lyx under dbg from now :)
>>
> You should *always* do that!
next crash at quiting lyx:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x08252d4c in ~InsetList (this=0x8edf794) at InsetList.cpp:60
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>> And without backtrace?
> >>>
> >>
> >> if you are happy with backtraces without recipy, i'll launch
> >> lyx under dbg from now :)
> >>
> > You should *always* do that!
> >
>
> here you have new one:
and another one, again edit menu:
P
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> And without backtrace?
>>>
>>
>> if you are happy with backtraces without recipy, i'll launch
>> lyx under dbg from now :)
>>
> You should *always* do that!
>
here you have new one:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x08d6844d in ?? ()
#1 0xea75de39 in ?? ()
#2 0x5b0cc483 in ??
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> after applying changes in preferences (instant preview off->on).c
>> cant reproduce even on the same document.
>>
> Could you play with the 'Edit->Paste Recent' menu and see if you can
> reproduce the crash?
tried but couldn't repeat, sorry.
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
And without backtrace?
if you are happy with backtraces without recipy, i'll launch
lyx under dbg from now :)
You should *always* do that!
Bad boy...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> And without backtrace?
>>>
>>
>> if you are happy with backtraces without recipy, i'll launch
>> lyx under dbg from now :)
>>
> You should *always* do that!
>
> Bad boy...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x089b9da7 in ?? ()
(
On Monday 04 August 2008 10:49:14 José Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using svn revision 26051 as the base for the first candidate
> to be RC1.
>
> As usual the sources packages can be found here:
> http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6
>
> If there are no problems building this re
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
i regret that i get few crashes everyday with simple editing in documents
without aparent
recipy to reproduce :(
And without backtrace?
if you are happy with backtraces without recipy, i'll launch
lyx under dbg from now :)
Yo
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> i regret that i get few crashes everyday with simple editing in documents
>> without aparent
>> recipy to reproduce :(
>>
> And without backtrace?
if you are happy with backtraces without recipy, i'll launch
lyx under dbg from now :)
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
José Matos wrote:
Hi,
I am using svn revision 26051 as the base for the first candidate to be
RC1.
As usual the sources packages can be found here:
http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6
If there are no problems building this release I will call it
> PLEASE fix verbosity of messages from iconv! If run under emacs shell, these
> huge messages will (basically) kill emacs:
> (View help/math causes:)
>
> unusual contents found: [raisebox][block [char 6 mathalpha][char m
> mathalpha][char m mathalpha]][block ][fbox [formula simple [grid [row [ce
Neal Becker wrote:
José Matos wrote:
Hi,
I am using svn revision 26051 as the base for the first candidate to be
RC1.
As usual the sources packages can be found here:
http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6
If there are no problems building this release I will call it official,
tag the releas
Built successfully on Windows.
regards Uwe
> I got on average one crash per minute when I edit Shortcuts.lyx.
What do you see in the console window when LyX crashes? This could be
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4873
regards Uwe
José Matos wrote:
I am using svn revision 26051 as the base for the first candidate to be
RC1.
If there are no problems building this release I will call it official, tag
the release and announce it to the four winds. :-)
Builds OK on Intel Mac 10.4.11 (creating a universal binary).
> i regret that i get few crashes everyday with simple editing in documents
> without aparent
> recipy to reproduce :(
I got on average one crash per minute when I edit Shortcuts.lyx.
Bo
José Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using svn revision 26051 as the base for the first candidate to be
> RC1.
>
> As usual the sources packages can be found here:
> http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6
>
> If there are no problems building this release I will call it official,
> tag
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:49 AM, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>I am using svn revision 26051 as the base for the first candidate to
> be RC1.
>
>As usual the sources packages can be found here:
> http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6
>
>If there are no problems
José Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using svn revision 26051 as the base for the first candidate to be
> RC1.
>
> As usual the sources packages can be found here:
> http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6
>
> If there are no problems building this release I will call it official,
> tag the release and an
Hi,
I am using svn revision 26051 as the base for the first candidate to be
RC1.
As usual the sources packages can be found here:
http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6
If there are no problems building this release I will call it official,
tag
the release and announce it
25 matches
Mail list logo
