On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:24:59AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> (And then there is the weirdness of keystrokes "jumping the queue"; but
> then, is there any guarantee in X that non-processed events are kept in
> temporal order?)
Everything else would be a big surprise to me.
Andre'
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 10:35, Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I think this looks good, if you can get somebody else to test it to
> verify your claims :-) then it should be committed.
>
> But please just get rid of the commented "processEvente"s.
I will
