Dear all,
(TLDR: feature freeze is 19 May. After 10 May, patches implementing a
new feature need a +1 from another LyX developer before committing to
master)
The feature freeze is still planned for 19 May.
Starting 10 May, a +1 is needed from another LyX developer for any patch
that is
hello,
all planned features for lyx 2.0 are in. starting from now
the main aim is to fix up the important bugs and regressions.
this also means freezing any refactorization work which is not
tightly connected with fixing bug(s).
if we are able to shrink the list of bugs to some reasonable
extent
Michael Schmitt wrote:
>> LyX CVS as on the development branch (HEAD) is now entering _hard_
>> feature freeze mode.
>>
>> If it is not a (crashing) bug or a regression you are not supposed
>> to work on it.
>>
>> If possible I'd like all bugzilla
LyX CVS as on the development branch (HEAD) is now entering _hard_
feature freeze mode.
If it is not a (crashing) bug or a regression you are not supposed to
work on it.
If possible I'd like all bugzilla bugs to loose the target version if
the case is not a (crashing) bug or a regression.
W
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:16:51PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> :-) Does "fatal bugs" say it better? Basically bugs that makes LyX
> unusable.
>
> If it is minor bugs, or bugs that have workarounds then they can wait
> (unless they are regressions at the same time.)
OK
john
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 03:46:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> If it is not a (crashing) bug or a regression you are not supposed to
>> work on it.
>
| Could you clarify what the brackets mean here?
:-) Does "fatal bugs" say it better? Basicall
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> If it is not a (crashing) bug or a regression you are not
| Lars> supposed to work on it.
>
| Is adding features for LyX/Mac allowed if they are non-intrusive for
| the rest
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 03:46:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> If it is not a (crashing) bug or a regression you are not supposed to
> work on it.
Could you clarify what the brackets mean here?
regards
john
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> If it is not a (crashing) bug or a regression you are not
Lars> supposed to work on it.
Is adding features for LyX/Mac allowed if they are non-intrusive for
the rest of the world?
JMarc
This is just to make it mentioned in a thread of its own and not just
a message in another thread.
LyX CVS as on the development branch (HEAD) is now entering _hard_
feature freeze mode.
If it is not a (crashing) bug or a regression you are not supposed to
work on it.
If possible I'd lik
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 03:01:10PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> what was the outcome of our "code/feature freeze" discussion? Have we
> already entered the testing phase or are we still optimizing the code base?
We are slowly changing from "bre
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:46:11PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Anyway, I don't want to complain about the large list of open bugs (I
> even have no right to do). I just wanted to draw some attention to
> bugzilla.
Sure. Thanks very much for your triage efforts so far, they are much
apprecia
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 03:01:10PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
open bugs and deciding which bugs are still relevant and which have been
fixed in the meantime. Right now, we have 352 open bugs. If we add those
Please remember the majority of those bugs are *not* new in 1.4cvs, and
do not
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 03:01:10PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> open bugs and deciding which bugs are still relevant and which have been
> fixed in the meantime. Right now, we have 352 open bugs. If we add those
Please remember the majority of those bugs are *not* new in 1.4cvs, and
do not r
Hello everybody,
what was the outcome of our "code/feature freeze" discussion? Have we
already entered the testing phase or are we still optimizing the code base?
Currently, I am in the process of browsing through the bugzilla list of
open bugs and deciding which bugs are still re
> Actually I am not sure about the utility of these 'copy layout' (and the
> proposed 'copz float') feature at all.
It seems that you have not done much layout file maintenance. Before
this and Input have been introduced, many layout files just slowly
died from bitrot...
JMarc
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:56:43PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> NoFloat is another though.
Indeed.
André
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:06:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Hmm... perhaps... but it will be easy to add later.
| >
| > | - add a CopyFloat tag
| >
| > This as well
|
|
| Actually I am not sure about the utility of these 'copy layout'
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:06:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Hmm... perhaps... but it will be easy to add later.
>
> | - add a CopyFloat tag
>
> This as well
Actually I am not sure about the utility of these 'copy layout' (and the
proposed 'copz float') feature at all.
Together wit
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>
| Lars> | Lars> Do anyone have a problem with tha
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 12:23:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> Do anyone have a problem with that?
>
> I will not have time to finish the 'read floats from layout' things
> before this date. Now that everything
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:42:35PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 29 August 2002 9:16 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Do anyone have a problem with that?
>
> You want to do something important on Friday 13th?
No. He explicitly wanted to do nothing...
Andre'
--
Those who desire t
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:42:35PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 29 August 2002 9:16 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Do anyone have a problem with that?
>
> You want to do something important on Friday 13th?
>
> (My birthday by the way.
Mine too (in May)
> I think 13 is a lucky
On Thursday 29 August 2002 9:16 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Do anyone have a problem with that?
You want to do something important on Friday 13th?
(My birthday by the way. I think 13 is a lucky number...)
Angus. Slowly trawling through 953 lyx messages...
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Lars> | Lars> Do anyone have a problem with that?
>>
Lars> | I will not have time to finish the 'read floats
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Do anyone have a problem with that?
>
| I will not have time to finish the 'read floats from layout' things
| before this date. Now that everything is moved into LyXTextClas
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Do anyone have a problem with that?
I will not have time to finish the 'read floats from layout' things
before this date. Now that everything is moved into LyXTextClass, it
should not be difficult, in fact. So if somebody is w
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:16:41AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Do anyone have a problem with that?
Not me.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Do anyone have a problem with that?
--
Lgb
29 matches
Mail list logo
