Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Is there any reason why we explicitly turn off exception handling
> | anymore? Our oldest 'supported' compiler is gcc 2.95 and that has no
> | problems in this regard.
>>
> | I ask for purely selfish reasons. My cross-platform glob func
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:03:34PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> And, no uncaught exceptions would not be cauth by the signal handler.
Instead, we'd have to create our own custom handler for uncaught
exceptions. There are a couple of strategies for implementing
something like that, so it
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Is there any reason why we explicitly turn off exception handling anymore?
| Our oldest 'supported' compiler is gcc 2.95 and that has no problems in
| this regard.
>
| I ask for purely selfish reasons. My cross-platform glob funct
Is there any reason why we explicitly turn off exception handling anymore?
Our oldest 'supported' compiler is gcc 2.95 and that has no problems in
this regard.
I ask for purely selfish reasons. My cross-platform glob function and my
Bourne shell-like command line parser both use
