> Ok. For fixed with we require both to and from unicode, and for
> variable length we require only from unicode.
>
> Then I propose that we do this: make both to and from unicode be
> purvirtual in EncodingConverter (I think we perhaps should change that
> name...not important), and create a sec
>> Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes:
LGB> Asger,
LGB> Why does EC.C has definitions for convertToUnicode and
LGB> convertFromUnicode? Couldn't these just be pure virtual?
Ok. For fixed with we require both to and from unicode, and for
variable length we require only from unicode.
Then I prop
Asger,
Why does EC.C has definitions for convertToUnicode and
convertFromUnicode? Couldn't these just be pure virtual?
and how about a name change?
toUnicode and fromUnicode, does not have less meaning than the longer
variants.
Lgb
