Pavel Sanda writes:
> ahh, thats misunderstanding. there will be cascade of 3 dialogs:
> 1. emergency found - original/recover
> 2. delete emergency file - yes/no
> 3. warning Do not forget to save your file now!
>
> i only added "don't show me again" to 3. it is not as so easy to lose it.
OK the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Pavel Sanda writes:
> > could you elaborate more? this dialog cascade is not going to appear
> > often.
>
> I mean this is a case where the user may be annoyed that we made it so
> easy to loose the emergency file: click on "don't show me again" one
> day, and lose a
Pavel Sanda writes:
> could you elaborate more? this dialog cascade is not going to appear
> often.
I mean this is a case where the user may be annoyed that we made it so
easy to loose the emergency file: click on "don't show me again" one
day, and lose a file 6 months later by mistake.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > Unfortunately not. However, it might be worth have this new sort of
> > > alert (if we want to implement "don't ask me next time" type of
> > > alerts).
> >
> > would you be satisfied when i change this patch so that
> > Alert::warning(_("Emergency file deleted") h
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Pavel Sanda writes:
> >
> > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > >> I think that too many dialogs mean that people won't read them. I
> > >> prefer the approach with a new checkbox as proposed in the bug, since
> > >> it explicitly tells that the file will be deleted
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > i would like lyx allowing removal of emergency files. i don't agree with
> > automatical removal as suggested in
> > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2120 ,
> > so the following patch implements one more confirmation dialog in case
>
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> hi,
>
> i would like lyx allowing removal of emergency files. i don't agree with
> automatical removal as suggested in
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2120 ,
> so the following patch implements one more confirmation dialog in case
> newer .emergency file exists (app
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> I think that too many dialogs mean that people won't read them. I
> >> prefer the approach with a new checkbox as proposed in the bug, since
> >> it explicitly tells that the file will be deleted and allows to
> >> avoid that (better that 4 buttons in the dialog IMO
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I think that too many dialogs mean that people won't read them. I
>> prefer the approach with a new checkbox as proposed in the bug, since
>> it explicitly tells that the file will be deleted and allows to
>> avoid that (bett
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think that too many dialogs mean that people won't read them. I
> prefer the approach with a new checkbox as proposed in the bug, since
> it explicitly tells that the file will be deleted and allows to
> avoid that (better that 4 buttons in the dialog IMO).
is it po
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i would like lyx allowing removal of emergency files. i don't agree with
> automatical removal as suggested in
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2120 ,
> so the following patch implements one more confirmation dialog in case
> newer .emergency file
On Saturday 06 September 2008 20:36:17 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> objections?
I agree that we should do something about it. Let us collect opinions around.
BTW did not we had this behaviour before and it was changed to the current? I
am just asking I am not sure if this was the case...
> pavel
--
Jo
hi,
i would like lyx allowing removal of emergency files. i don't agree with
automatical removal as suggested in
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2120 ,
so the following patch implements one more confirmation dialog in case
newer .emergency file exists (appears after "load original"/"recov
13 matches
Mail list logo
