On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:54:46AM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> >
> > It works rather well if you really have people familiar with the languages.
>
> Hmmm, ok. But one thing that raised in the former discussion is the fact
> that we need to target the language at novices and those who are not
> p
On 2 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
> Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I have no problem delaying everything until 1.2.0, I should probably
> | return to InsetGraphics to complete it or at least make it presentable in
> | 1.2.0
>
> Yes, please.
yeah, being able
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I have no problem delaying everything until 1.2.0, I should probably
| return to InsetGraphics to complete it or at least make it presentable in
| 1.2.0
Yes, please.
--
Lgb
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I think Lars is already bored with saying that he doesn't want any such
| > code in LyX proper right now,
|
| I do hope he is ;-)
| > so this whole embedding stuff is to be delayed, it will be pretty hard
| > to maintain such a thing without having
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > so this whole embedding stuff is to be delayed, it will be pretty hard
> > to maintain such a thing without having it in CVS.
> >
> > Lars, will you make a concession to accept the embedding code into a
> > branch? It might be better anyhow to work
> I think Lars is already bored with saying that he doesn't want any such
> code in LyX proper right now,
I do hope he is ;-)
> so this whole embedding stuff is to be delayed, it will be pretty hard
> to maintain such a thing without having it in CVS.
>
> Lars, will you make a concession to acc
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > It works rather well if you really have people familiar with the languages.
> >
> > Hmmm, ok. But one thing that raised in the former discussion is the fact
> > that we need to target the language at novices and those who are not
> > programmers, th
> > It works rather well if you really have people familiar with the languages.
>
> Hmmm, ok. But one thing that raised in the former discussion is the fact
> that we need to target the language at novices and those who are not
> programmers, the example given there is Amirs Mom, I'm pretty sure
* Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010502 10:28]:
> > Ok, before we serious start this kind of discussion on "Which scripting
> > language?" why don't we agree that the best thing is for scripting
> > language to be optional and let the user choose?
>
> Good point. If you leave out Python off t
> Ok, before we serious start this kind of discussion on "Which scripting
> language?" why don't we agree that the best thing is for scripting
> language to be optional and let the user choose?
Good point. If you leave out Python off the core, I won't argue.
On the other hands there are a few ta
> Maybe we could have a small that of tasks that are likely to be solved with
> scripting langauage and compare how easy it is to solve them with the
> different languages.
To be read as:
> Maybe we could have a compiliation of a small set of tasks that are
> likely to be solved with scripting l
There's an archive of most of the previous discussions at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/
Do you really want repeat all that again? For a fourth time?
Allan. (ARRae)
* Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010502 09:36]:
> > I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
> > the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
> > out how to do it exactly.
>
> Ok, before we ser
> I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
> the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
> out how to do it exactly.
Ok, before we seriously start this kind of implementation I would really
like to have this "W
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
| the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
| out how to do it exactly.
|
| One thing that will be needed is to be able to let
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Baruch Even wrote:
> * John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010429 18:23]:
> > On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Baruch Even wrote:
> >
> > > I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
> > > the interpreter was designe
* John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010429 18:23]:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Baruch Even wrote:
>
> > I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
> > the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
> > out
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Baruch Even wrote:
> I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
> the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
> out how to do it exactly.
>
> One thing that will be needed is to be ab
I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
out how to do it exactly.
One thing that will be needed is to be able to let the python code
execute various parts of lyx. In the trivial c
19 matches
Mail list logo
