On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 12:28:13PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > 1. Qbibtex style browser. We should use an editable combo box for the
> > style choice instead of the confusing way xforms did it
Much better thanks. (I still think it's the wrong place for Update
button at all, but that's another
Edwin Leuven wrote:
>>I would prefer only two tabs (also for xforms, if I had
>>to do it again)
>>main/lyx - filename and lyx stuff
>>latex - all what depends to latex
>>
>
> but basically everything depends on latex, no?
- the whole lyx-tab not.
- the filename and the bb for both, but the bb
> I would prefer only two tabs (also for xforms, if I had
> to do it again)
> main/lyx - filename and lyx stuff
> latex - all what depends to latex
but basically everything depends on latex, no?
Edwin Leuven wrote:
>>Yes, it is difficult :)
>>
>
> what about:
>
> http://www.fee.uva.nl/scholar/mdw/leuven/lyx/graphics1.png
> http://www.fee.uva.nl/scholar/mdw/leuven/lyx/graphics2.png
> http://www.fee.uva.nl/scholar/mdw/leuven/lyx/graphics3.png
> http://www.fee.uva.nl/scholar/mdw/leuven/ly
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 12:28:13PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > 3. QCitation. I'm not sure about the new layout. The browsers are too
> > small and in contrast the info and search sections are to obig. There's
> > no visual association of search with available citations. There's no
> > clear ass
> 1. Qbibtex style browser. We should use an editable combo box for the
> style choice instead of the confusing way xforms did it
I agree
> 2. QExternal. can we put the edit/update/view above the template stuff
> so it's better associated with the file in question rather than the
> template desc
> Yes, it is difficult :)
what about:
http://www.fee.uva.nl/scholar/mdw/leuven/lyx/graphics1.png
http://www.fee.uva.nl/scholar/mdw/leuven/lyx/graphics2.png
http://www.fee.uva.nl/scholar/mdw/leuven/lyx/graphics3.png
http://www.fee.uva.nl/scholar/mdw/leuven/lyx/graphics4.png
?
Ed.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:58:06PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> xforms' ?
I mean Qt's
> (I think it's always difficult to have a clear dialog with tons of features.
> But we cannot just remove the features.)
Yes, it is difficult :)
regards
john
--
"Of all manifestations of power, r
John Levon wrote:
> the graphics dialog needs a serious revisit now I think. I don't have
> much luck with using it ...
xforms' ?
No good idea how to improve it. But if you have suggestions...
(I think it's always difficult to have a clear dialog with tons of features.
But we cannot just remove
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:40:19PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> And the graphics dialog (compared to xforms) still lacks a "default" entry in
> the display ("Show") choice which takes the value of preferences.
the graphics dialog needs a serious revisit now I think. I don't have
much lu
John Levon wrote:
> I have a couple of comments on things that could still be improved IMHO
And the graphics dialog (compared to xforms) still lacks a "default" entry in
the display ("Show") choice which takes the value of preferences.
Regards,
Juergen
I have a couple of comments on things that could still be improved IMHO
:
1. Qbibtex style browser. We should use an editable combo box for the
style choice instead of the confusing way xforms did it
2. QExternal. can we put the edit/update/view above the template stuff
so it's better associate
12 matches
Mail list logo
