John Levon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 12:21:57PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> > maybe that this is always known, than forget it ... ;-)
> >
> > have a look at the attached lyx-demo from 1.1.6fix3.
> > the first footnote has a lyx-inserted url which works well,
> > the second footnote h
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 12:21:57PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> maybe that this is always known, than forget it ... ;-)
>
> have a look at the attached lyx-demo from 1.1.6fix3.
> the first footnote has a lyx-inserted url which works well,
> the second footnote has an ert-url \url{...}, which is
maybe that this is always known, than forget it ... ;-)
have a look at the attached lyx-demo from 1.1.6fix3.
the first footnote has a lyx-inserted url which works well,
the second footnote has an ert-url \url{...}, which is
converted in a wrong way. this happens to all footnotes
with any ert.
He