On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:14 PM Jason Sun wrote:
> Comment: I am replying to Joel's message.
>
> Hi Joel. Thanks for your response. I have no idea the thread is in a mess.
> I replied to my previous messages by hitting the reply button on the lyx
> mail archive. It automatically jumped to my Gmail
Comment: I am replying to Joel's message.
Hi Joel. Thanks for your response. I have no idea the thread is in a mess.
I replied to my previous messages by hitting the reply button on the lyx
mail archive. It automatically jumped to my Gmail. Also weirdly, sometimes
I get reply notification in my Gm
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:23 AM Jason Sun wrote:
> Okay. I will then build up a prototype then. It is basically a jupyter
> notebook pane.
>
Jason,
Please include comments that you are replying to and either top post or
bottom post (this forum's preference, as I've done here). That way there
is
Here is the snapshot of the prototype.
https://github.com/jupyter/notebook/issues/1604#issuecomment-507746234
Also, we could do the other direction: when editing jupyter notebook with
heavy mathematics component, we could use LyX main buffer as a draft and
with a proper implemented convert function, the content could be rendered
in the jupyter notebook in just one click.
Okay. I will then build up a prototype then. It is basically a jupyter
notebook pane.
On Tuesday, 2 July 2019 00.44.07 WEST Jason Sun wrote:
> I read on the web that if LGPLv3 are used, the final product will be GPL3.
> However, LyX is GPL2+. I don't know if the LyX community has plan to
> upgrade it GPL3.
Why?
GPLv2+ is already GPLv3. That is what it means the + there. It also me
I read on the web that if LGPLv3 are used, the final product will be GPL3.
However, LyX is GPL2+. I don't know if the LyX community has plan to
upgrade it GPL3.
On Monday, 1 July 2019 18.05.27 WEST Jason Sun wrote:
> In this post, the request for a better math rendering for jupyter has been
> brought up(https://github.com/jupyter/notebook/issues/1604). It seems that
> the jupyter community likes LyX very much. The end goal is to create a
> function that le
Just want to add a few words here:
In this post, the request for a better math rendering for jupyter has been
brought up(https://github.com/jupyter/notebook/issues/1604). It seems that
the jupyter community likes LyX very much. The end goal is to create a
function that lets Jupyter to communicate
I think you are absolutely right. I tried the Python Approach, it is not
very good. So far I just created a new Dialog in CPP and it seems that only
using CPP and Qt is better to maintain.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 05:48:05PM -0400, Jason Sun wrote:
> I have managed to created two prototypes both extending LyX to include some
> scientific IDE features. One uses pure C++ and the other uses PySide2. From
> a ease of compile standpoint, the c++ one is better to integrate since the
> other
I have managed to created two prototypes both extending LyX to include some
scientific IDE features. One uses pure C++ and the other uses PySide2. From
a ease of compile standpoint, the c++ one is better to integrate since the
other one, if chosen would most likely to include another python
interpr
13 matches
Mail list logo
