Le 07/12/2020 à 19:18, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 02/12/2020 à 15:35, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Dienstag, dem 01.12.2020 um 10:46 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
Jürgen knows the most about this, I think, but my sense is that (2)
is
the way to go. I find the ButtonController q
Le 02/12/2020 à 15:35, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Dienstag, dem 01.12.2020 um 10:46 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
Jürgen knows the most about this, I think, but my sense is that (2)
is
the way to go. I find the ButtonController quite difficult to use.
I tend to agree.
OK, I have
Le 02/12/2020 à 15:35, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Dienstag, dem 01.12.2020 um 10:46 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
Jürgen knows the most about this, I think, but my sense is that (2)
is
the way to go. I find the ButtonController quite difficult to use.
I tend to agree.
Thanks, I b
Am Dienstag, dem 01.12.2020 um 10:46 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> Jürgen knows the most about this, I think, but my sense is that (2)
> is
> the way to go. I find the ButtonController quite difficult to use.
I tend to agree.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signe
On 12/1/20 9:50 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> ButtonController has a addReadonly() feature that allows to control
> which widgets should be disabled in read-only mode. It add the widgets
> to a read_only_ vector, but this vector is never used? Why?
>
> The answer is that the code
Dear all,
ButtonController has a addReadonly() feature that allows to control
which widgets should be disabled in read-only mode. It add the widgets
to a read_only_ vector, but this vector is never used? Why?
The answer is that the code was disabled a long time ago, and (partly)
removed.
c
