Re: Development of a development model

2011-05-05 Thread Julien Rioux
On 04/05/2011 10:16 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for non-trivial feature sets if they like? +1 Then we can just as well stay with svn. I don't wan

Re: Development of a development model

2011-05-05 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:24:13PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote: > > [..] > >That's not a joke, it's not made up. I am honestly not aware > >of any single operation, not even artificial scenarios, where > >git performs worse than svn. > > Maybe this one: > > time svn co svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-dev

Re: Development of a development model

2011-05-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > offereing linear > numbering instead of git revision: i would love this feature. p

Re: Development of a development model

2011-05-05 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 05.05.2011 23:24, Peter Kümmel wrote: time git clone git://gitorious.org/lyx/lyx.git real2m41.146s Cool, 12 years LyX commits only a mouse click away. And may first commit was on SCons files ;) Peter

Re: Development of a development model

2011-05-05 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 04.05.2011 23:45, Andre Poenitz wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 04:16:13PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for non-trivial feature sets if they like

Re: Development of a development model

2011-05-05 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 05.05.2011 22:11, Peter Kümmel wrote: On 05.05.2011 14:14, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/05/2011 01:00, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more concrete

Re: Development of a development model

2011-05-05 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 05.05.2011 14:14, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 04/05/2011 01:00, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more concrete. I'm aware there might be some learning c

Re: Development of a development model

2011-05-05 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 04/05/2011 01:00, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Hi all, I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more concrete. I'm aware there might be some learning curve for developers who are not used to git

Re: Development of a development model

2011-05-04 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 04:16:13PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for > > > non-trivial feature sets if they like? > > > > +1 > > > > Then

Re: Development of a development model

2011-05-04 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 04/05/2011 16:16, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Pavel Sanda > wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: > Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for > non-trivial feature sets if they like? +1 Then we can j

Re: Development of a development model

2011-05-04 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for > > non-trivial feature sets if they like? > > +1 > Then we can just as well stay with svn. I don't want the branching model because you can use bran

Re: Development of a development model

2011-05-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
Andre Poenitz wrote: > Close to the current svn model, but allow people to use branches for > non-trivial feature sets if they like? +1 > > - the place to store the git repo, > > Same place as now? Or gitorious? i already commented for the rest of the questions in the other thread. pavel

Re: Development of a development model

2011-05-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:00:16AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Hi all, > > I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model > and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more concrete. > > I'm aware there might be some learning curve for devel

Development of a development model

2011-05-03 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Hi all, I think that there is a large enough support for the new development model and/or introduction of git to think about how to make things more concrete. I'm aware there might be some learning curve for developers who are not used to git yet, so I'll not rush things. My plans are to first f