On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:46:14PM +1800, Bo Peng wrote:
> > No, that's what I use, too. Latex2rtf can render equations through
> > bitmaps but by default uses EQ field codes. If you right click on
> > the gray graphics, you get a menu to activate/deactivate the field
> > codes.
>
> That webpage s
No, that's what I use, too. Latex2rtf can render equations through
bitmaps but by default uses EQ field codes. If you right click on
the gray graphics, you get a menu to activate/deactivate the field
codes.
That webpage says: if you double click the field, it will be converted
to OLD equation ob
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:34:49PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> On 2/15/07, Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:30:52PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> >
> > > I spent another hour on latex2rtf. Formulas in the generated rtf file
> > > simply can not be edited in word.
>
On 2/15/07, Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:30:52PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> I spent another hour on latex2rtf. Formulas in the generated rtf file
> simply can not be edited in word.
Thay can be edited, as they are EQ field codes.
I get two types of stuf
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:30:52PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> I spent another hour on latex2rtf. Formulas in the generated rtf file
> simply can not be edited in word.
Thay can be edited, as they are EQ field codes. The syntax is similar
to that of TeX and they are in every word version, even if MS
We will need a thorough investigation of the different
options, so anything discussed now with half knowledge is either moot or
will delay 1.5.0 a lot.
100% Agreed.
Bo
Am Donnerstag, 15. Februar 2007 18:59 schrieb Bo Peng:
> Let us discuss this after 1.5.0 is released.
Pretty please. We will need a thorough investigation of the different
options, so anything discussed now with half knowledge is either moot or
will delay 1.5.0 a lot.
Georg
BTW, the odf toolkit may help us a lot in the transition.
http://odftoolkit.openoffice.org/
Bo
We could write a new converter, but it should be possible to do equally
well from LaTeX.
A converter would work but if we are going towards XML, I suggest that
we look seriously at the possibility of adopting ODF. Something like:
1. add a converter to write to ODF, along the way, add file manag
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> I strongly believe that the next big thing for lyx should be ODF
Bo> or Word/XML compatibility.
We could write a new converter, but it should be possible to do equally
well from LaTeX.
JMarc
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I strongly believe that the next big thing for lyx should be ODF or
> Word/XML compatibility.
I agree completely and wholeheartedly.
Andreas
I spent hours, under both linux and windows, trying to use tex4ht to
convert even a simplest tex file to open office. The generated .odt
file just does not work. This is after I follow closely the
instructions in
http://facweb.knowlton.ohio-state.edu/pviton/support/tex4ht.html and
passed all the
12 matches
Mail list logo