Re: Cross-reference Problem

2008-03-24 Thread rgheck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: rgheck wrote: In this case, I'm looking at e.g. Customization to Extended Features. Those don't show up right. But maybe they shouldn't show up right? I don't think we support such refs beyond document scope (in the GUI). OK. This is some kind of holdover

Re: Cross-reference Problem

2008-03-24 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
rgheck wrote: > In this case, I'm looking at e.g. Customization to Extended Features. > Those don't show up right. But maybe they shouldn't show up right? I don't think we support such refs beyond document scope (in the GUI). Jürgen

Re: Cross-reference Problem

2008-03-24 Thread rgheck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: rgheck wrote: All cross-file cross-references in 1.6 seem to show up as "broken". "cross-file" means reference from child to master, right? xrefs from master to child or from child to child work here. In this case, I'm looking at e.g. Customization to Ex

Re: Cross-reference Problem

2008-03-24 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
rgheck wrote: > All cross-file cross-references in 1.6 seem to show up as "broken". "cross-file" means reference from child to master, right? xrefs from master to child or from child to child work here. Jürgen

Cross-reference Problem

2008-03-24 Thread rgheck
All cross-file cross-references in 1.6 seem to show up as "broken". rh