On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 07:01:51PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 04/12/2016 à 18:48, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > I am confused now. You make a convoluted patch justifying it by saying
> > that it was done in view of a proper fix. The simpler one-liner has the
> > same effect and actually
Le 04/12/2016 à 18:48, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
I am confused now. You make a convoluted patch justifying it by saying
that it was done in view of a proper fix. The simpler one-liner has the
same effect and actually would not be possible if the proper fix was in
place. Given that it is not bac
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 06:21:53PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 04/12/2016 à 17:04, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >
> > Weak arguments, given that you say the patch was written with the
> > proper fix in mind (which is not in stable).
>
> It is probably clear to Enrico (I hope) but maybe l
Le 04/12/2016 à 17:04, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Weak arguments, given that you say the patch was written with the
proper fix in mind (which is not in stable).
It is probably clear to Enrico (I hope) but maybe less to people who did
not follow the discussions and the mentioned commits too cl
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 01:01:13PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 04/12/2016 à 12:25, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 11:57:29AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >
> > > Le 04/12/2016 à 00:57, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > > > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 11:59:33PM +0100,
Le 04/12/2016 à 12:25, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 11:57:29AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 04/12/2016 à 00:57, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 11:59:33PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
This is the same as
https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@l
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 11:57:29AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 04/12/2016 à 00:57, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 11:59:33PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the same as
> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg196794.html. I
>
Le 04/12/2016 à 00:57, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 11:59:33PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
This is the same as
https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg196794.html. I
have now backported the fix.
Hmmm... a quite convoluted patch. There was a one-liner f
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 11:59:33PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>
> This is the same as
> https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg196794.html. I
> have now backported the fix.
Hmmm... a quite convoluted patch. There was a one-liner fixing this.
--
Enrico
Le 02/12/2016 à 01:08, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 12/01/2016 06:44 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:50:19PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
This only occurs with 2.2.3dev (not with 2.2.2, nor with 2.3.0dev):
1) Start lyx, make sure the source pane is closed
2) File->New
On 12/01/2016 06:44 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:50:19PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
>> This only occurs with 2.2.3dev (not with 2.2.2, nor with 2.3.0dev):
>>
>> 1) Start lyx, make sure the source pane is closed
>> 2) File->New
>> 3) View->Source Pane
>> 4) View->
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:50:19PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> This only occurs with 2.2.3dev (not with 2.2.2, nor with 2.3.0dev):
>
> 1) Start lyx, make sure the source pane is closed
> 2) File->New
> 3) View->Source Pane
> 4) View->Source Pane
> 5) File->Close
> 6) File->New
> 7) View->So
Am Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2016 um 19:50:19, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
> This only occurs with 2.2.3dev (not with 2.2.2, nor with 2.3.0dev):
>
> 1) Start lyx, make sure the source pane is closed
> 2) File->New
> 3) View->Source Pane
> 4) View->Source Pane
> 5) File->Close
> 6) File->New
> 7) Vie
This only occurs with 2.2.3dev (not with 2.2.2, nor with 2.3.0dev):
1) Start lyx, make sure the source pane is closed
2) File->New
3) View->Source Pane
4) View->Source Pane
5) File->Close
6) File->New
7) View->Source Pane
Now lyx segfaults:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x
14 matches
Mail list logo