Re: Counters for linuxdoc and docbook.

2003-02-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 04 February 2003 08:52, Lars Gullik Bjxnnes wrote: | > | Yes, I know that. And actually adding | > | | > | Input stdcounters.inc | > | Input stdfloats.inc | > | | > | to both linuxdoc.layout and db_stdclass.inc will do most of the work. | >

Re: Counters for linuxdoc and docbook.

2003-02-04 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 08:52, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Yes, I know that. And actually adding > | > | Input stdcounters.inc > | Input stdfloats.inc > | > | to both linuxdoc.layout and db_stdclass.inc will do most of the work. > | > | Is that reasonable? > > Perhaps... Can I can I

Re: Counters for linuxdoc and docbook.

2003-02-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Monday 03 February 2003 18:56, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | Hi, | > | I know that this comes late in the dev cycle, but I forgot this patch. | > | > Not only late in the dev cycle, but more than a month

Re: Counters for linuxdoc and docbook.

2003-02-04 Thread José Matos
On Monday 03 February 2003 18:56, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Hi, > | I know that this comes late in the dev cycle, but I forgot this patch. > > Not only late in the dev cycle, but more than a month out into the > complete (?) freeze cycle. Yes, I

Re: Counters for linuxdoc and docbook.

2003-02-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi, | I know that this comes late in the dev cycle, but I forgot this patch. Not only late in the dev cycle, but more than a month out into the complete (?) freeze cycle. With a release looming on the horizon within a week... | What is weir

Counters for linuxdoc and docbook.

2003-02-03 Thread José Matos
Hi, I know that this comes late in the dev cycle, but I forgot this patch. What is weird is that even if I define the right counters I don't get a count for section-like layouts. It doesn't complain also. Any hint? Notice that the enumerate layout works as expected, at di