Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > since we moved from soul to ulem is it correct to use ulem for
> > strike-through text or should it be soulutf?
>
> Given the waggonloads of problems we had with soul, I'd opt for ulem
> (provided, it doesn't have any drawbacks wrt struckout text
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> since we moved from soul to ulem is it correct to use ulem for
> strike-through text or should it be soulutf?
Given the waggonloads of problems we had with soul, I'd opt for ulem
(provided, it doesn't have any drawbacks wrt struckout text).
Jürgen
Juergen, Uwe,
since we moved from soul to ulem is it correct to use ulem for strike-through
text or should it be soulutf?
i have nearly working patch for this.
pavel
