Re: ControlCharacter and font member

2007-09-29 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: Can anybody think of a reason why ControlCharacter has a Font* member, and not a Font? I think it must be connected with these lines: bool ControlCharacter::initi

Re: ControlCharacter and font member

2007-09-29 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: Can anybody think of a reason why ControlCharacter has a Font* member, and not a Font? I think it must be connected with these lines: bool ControlCharacter::initialiseParams(string const &

Re: ControlCharacter and font member

2007-09-29 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > >Can anybody think of a reason why ControlCharacter has a Font* member, > >and not a Font? > > > I think it must be connected with these lines: > bool ControlCharacter::initialiseParams(string const &) > { > //

Re: ControlCharacter and font member

2007-09-29 Thread Richard Heck
Andre Poenitz wrote: Can anybody think of a reason why ControlCharacter has a Font* member, and not a Font? I think it must be connected with these lines: bool ControlCharacter::initialiseParams(string const &) { // Do this the first time only. if (!font_.get()) font_.reset(new Font(Font::ALL

ControlCharacter and font member

2007-09-29 Thread Andre Poenitz
Can anybody think of a reason why ControlCharacter has a Font* member, and not a Font? Andre'