; >
>
>> >
>
>> >> How does one add compiler flags for the CMake version? Attached is a
>
>> >
>
>> >> patch that allows me to do the following:
>
>> >
>
>> >>
>
>> >
>
>> >> cmake -DCMA
Am Freitag, 29. November 2013 um 23:55:32, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 29. November 2013 um 01:39:33, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> >
> >> How does one add compiler flags for the CMake version? Att
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 29. November 2013 um 01:39:33, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
>
>> How does one add compiler flags for the CMake version? Attached is a
>
>> patch that allows me to do the following:
>
>>
>
Am Freitag, 29. November 2013 um 01:39:33, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> How does one add compiler flags for the CMake version? Attached is a
> patch that allows me to do the following:
>
> cmake -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-Werror"
I would not try to overwrite a variable 'CM
How does one add compiler flags for the CMake version? Attached is a
patch that allows me to do the following:
cmake -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-Werror"
Is there a different way that is recommended?
Scott
From 8bb98a77d64dfc673a3082e309975034372bfd6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott
Konrad Hofbauer wrote:
For cross-compiling PPC-Binaries on an Intel-Mac (which Bennett and me
need to do to create universal binaries for release), I need to set
export CFLAGS="-arch ppc" export CXXFLAGS="-arch ppc" export
LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -arch ppc"
and they automatically get passed to g+
For cross-compiling PPC-Binaries on an Intel-Mac (which Bennett and me
need to do to create universal binaries for release), I need to set
export CFLAGS="-arch ppc"
export CXXFLAGS="-arch ppc"
export LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -arch ppc"
and they automatically get passed to g++, libtool, etc. (and w
"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can you use elf on OS/2? Repacking/converting to omf?
You can always patch the linker (ld) ;-) The compiler (gcc) need
not be patched, only need be reconfigured/recompiled.
> But hence one questions: I got excellent results in the past when using
>>>>> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Allan> Two newish compiler flags supported by egcs (and maybe gcc I've
Allan> never noticed) can have dramatic effects upon compiled code
Allan> size. These flags are : -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions
BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE==
>To: LyX Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Compiler Flags
.
using egcs-1.1.1UNSTRIPPED STRIPPED
CXXFLAGS="-g3 -O"9,399,529 1,886,719
CXXFLAGS="-O"2,146,834 1,886,7
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two newish compiler flags supported by egcs (and maybe gcc I've never
> noticed) can have dramatic effects upon compiled code size. These flags
> are :
> -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions
gcc 2.8 supports both flags and they (esp
Two newish compiler flags supported by egcs (and maybe gcc I've never
noticed) can have dramatic effects upon compiled code size. These flags
are :
-fno-rtti -fno-exceptions
We don't use either of rtti or exceptions in 1.0 or 1.1 and discussions to
date have indicated
12 matches
Mail list logo