On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I don't know about the PDP-10, but the PDP-11 is *very* well known to me.
>
> PDP-7 (quite different architecture) was one of the three original machines
> that Unix was written for.
>
> PDP-11/10 was my first "personal computer" here at the institu
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> I don't know about the PDP-10, but the PDP-11 is *very* well
Martin> known to me.
Martin> PDP-7 (quite different architecture) was one of the three
Martin> original machines that Unix was written for.
You are right, of course
On Fre, 29 Jan 1999 Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>jmarc jabbed,
>
>
>> Amir> Do we know of a UNIX platform it *doesn't* run on?
>
>> PDP-10?
>
>did someone actually put unix on those?
Yes, I think so - pure assembler.
C was developed to port Unix to the PDP-11, IIRC :-)
Greetings,
Jochen
> > "Richard" == Richard E Hawkins Esq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Richard> jmarc jabbed,
> Amir> Do we know of a UNIX platform it *doesn't* run on?
>
> >> PDP-10?
>
> Richard> did someone actually put unix on those?
>
> I was under the impression that unix was developped for the PDP 1
> "Richard" == Richard E Hawkins Esq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> jmarc jabbed,
Amir> Do we know of a UNIX platform it *doesn't* run on?
>> PDP-10?
Richard> did someone actually put unix on those?
I was under the impression that unix was developped for the PDP 10.
But I might be w
jmarc jabbed,
> Amir> Do we know of a UNIX platform it *doesn't* run on?
> PDP-10?
did someone actually put unix on those?
Hmm, there must be something besides tops-10 and -20, since someone is
still selling clones . . .
--
> "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I thought the idea was to rename egcs to gcc 2.9 or 3.0 or anything
>> and continue with the egcs developping model. After all, the 'e' in
>> egcs stands for 'experimental'.
>>
>> Do you have links about this? I found nothin
> I thought the idea was to rename egcs to gcc 2.9 or 3.0 or anything
> and continue with the egcs developping model. After all, the 'e' in
> egcs stands for 'experimental'.
>
> Do you have links about this? I found nothing on the egcs mailing lists.
Yes, it seems you are right:
http://www.cygn
> "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Asger> Notice that gcc 2.9.0 will probably never come. egcs has
Asger> overtaken the compiler area. There is no one working on gcc
Asger> 2.8.x.
I thought the idea was to rename egcs to gcc 2.9 or 3.0 or anything
and continue
> Unfortunately the compiler I use most of the time is the one which is
> installed here at work. Since this is installed for 150+ users, they
> don't change compiler versions every week. We had 2.8.1 installed 2
> monthes ago, and this is already a good thing. When gcc 2.9.0 (or
> whatever it's c
> "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I used to. Now that I have gcc 2.8.1 installed, I don't really feel
>> like compiling a 70M binary again :)
Asger> If you use gcc 2.8.1, you should know that the gcc line as such
Asger> is dead. egcs has overtaken all gcc d
> I used to. Now that I have gcc 2.8.1 installed, I don't really feel
> like compiling a 70M binary again :)
If you use gcc 2.8.1, you should know that the gcc line as such is dead.
egcs has overtaken all gcc development. Egcs v1.1 is supposedly better
than gcc 2.8.1. Even RMS has expressed a w
> "Asger" == Asger Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Asger> We know of a few systems, where the provided compiler is not
Asger> good enough. This includes systems with gcc 2.6.x, but also
Asger> some of the proprietary ones. Jean-Marc is very helpful in
Asger> compiling on DEC and
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> I'll just reregister my opinion that while open source is a
Amir> great thing, it's not what we're selling here. We've mentioned
Amir> that LyX (and latex) are open source. Linux et al. are doing
Amir> just fine in the press and don't
Yes, sorry LyX members. My email client sometimes encrypts messages
when it's not appropriate. Sorry for the wasted bandwidth.
Best regards
--
Larry S. Marso
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 04:31:58PM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
> Your last message was PGP signed!
>
> -Amir
application/pgp-encrypted
Binary data
> I'll just reregister my opinion that while open source is a great thing,
> it's not what we're selling here. We've mentioned that LyX (and latex) are
> open source. Linux et al. are doing just fine in the press and don't need
> our PR help. "LyX runs on Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and most proprieta
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 12:32:38PM -0500, Larry S. Marso wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 01:24:06PM -0500, Larry S. Marso wrote:
>
> > LyX runs on standard Unix platforms, including Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD
> > and most proprietary Unix systems.
>
> Having taken another look, the above might be
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 01:24:06PM -0500, Larry S. Marso wrote:
> LyX runs on standard Unix platforms, including Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD
> and most proprietary Unix systems.
Having taken another look, the above might better read:
Lyx runs on the free, open source Unix platforms Linux, FreeBSD
> > "Larry" == Larry S Marso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Larry> Er, these are comments *on* Martin's latest. Best regards --
>
> Isn't it a (partial) rewrite of Martin's latest??
>
> I beginning to be lost in all these versions...
>
> JMarc
It *was* a comment on my latest brainchild,
> "Larry" == Larry S Marso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Larry> Er, these are comments *on* Martin's latest. Best regards --
Isn't it a (partial) rewrite of Martin's latest??
I beginning to be lost in all these versions...
JMarc
Er, these are comments *on* Martin's latest.
Best regards
--
Larry S. Marso
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 04:03:10PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> This looks good. I'd say I like it almost as much as Martin's
> latest.
>
> JMarc
>
> "Larry" == Larry S Marso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Larry> I worked over the language. Hope this is helpful.
Hi Larry,
This looks good. I'd say I like it almost as much as Martin's
latest.
JMarc
I worked over the language. Hope this is helpful.
Public release of LyX version 1.0.0
===
LyX, the Open Source Word Processor for Structured Documents
LyX is an advanced, open source word processor for
24 matches
Mail list logo
