On 05/16/2011 04:50 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 16/05/2011 00:00, Richard Heck a écrit :
>> I've tested this a bit and it seems to work. Additional testing and
>> comments would be welcome.
>
> The patch would be welcome too ;)
>
Doh.
Richard
>From 8314392962c042a18c95ac630869ec4421ac98
Le 16/05/2011 00:00, Richard Heck a écrit :
I've tested this a bit and it seems to work. Additional testing and
comments would be welcome.
The patch would be welcome too ;)
JMarc
PS: this time it is not me. Ha!
This patch attempts to fix a problem first reported by Diego: If you try
to view a child document, the macros declared in the parent do not work.
This is a regression from 1.6.x.
The problem is that we were cloning only the child, which then didn't
have a parent. The solution is to clone the whol
On 05/10/2011 04:12 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 05/10/2011 03:19 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
(compared to the following steps and to image
conversions), could we consider not to clone the buffer but do the
initial export before starting a new thread?
See above. There is no point in using th
On 05/10/2011 03:19 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2011-05-10, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 05/10/2011 11:15 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2011-05-09, Richard Heck wrote:
As, generally, the LyX -> first-non-native-format (latex, html, text)
export is fast
Export to latex is not fast. It seems to b
On 2011-05-10, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 05/10/2011 11:15 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2011-05-09, Richard Heck wrote:
>> As, generally, the LyX -> first-non-native-format (latex, html, text)
>> export is fast
> Export to latex is not fast. It seems to be fast on Linux because the
> proce
On 05/10/2011 11:15 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2011-05-09, Richard Heck wrote:
Discussion in the "Math Macros in Child Documents" thread has revealed a
problem with how we clone buffers with parents. The set up is this: You
have a master that defines a macro, and a child that uses it. If you t
On 2011-05-09, Richard Heck wrote:
> Discussion in the "Math Macros in Child Documents" thread has revealed a
> problem with how we clone buffers with parents. The set up is this: You
> have a master that defines a macro, and a child that uses it. If you try
> to compile just the child, it works i
Discussion in the "Math Macros in Child Documents" thread has revealed a
problem with how we clone buffers with parents. The set up is this: You
have a master that defines a macro, and a child that uses it. If you try
to compile just the child, it works in 1.6 but not in 2.0. The reason is
that, w
