On Friday 07 September 2001 17:24, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Am Freitag, 7. September 2001 17:52 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> > Anyway, the attached patch reduces the field from 85 to 84 pixels. If
> > Angus is willing to check and apply this, your eyes will (hopefully)
> > be satisified.
>
Am Freitag, 7. September 2001 17:52 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> Anyway, the attached patch reduces the field from 85 to 84 pixels. If
> Angus is willing to check and apply this, your eyes will (hopefully)
> be satisified.
Sorry, but there went something wrong in the changelog %-(
Here's a cor
Am Freitag, 7. September 2001 17:02 schrieb Michael Schmitt:
> Ok, but the box should not start at x=10 because that is where the
> frame is printed. Could somebody be so kind and test whether 11 or 12
> instead of 10 in line 271 looks better?
Well, that's what I did first (starting at 15 because
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 07 September 2001 15:17, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > thanks for fixing the alignment of "Language:" in the character dialog!
> >
> > However, I noticed that the border of the dialog is not shown correctly
> > at the height of "Langua
On Friday 07 September 2001 15:17, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for fixing the alignment of "Language:" in the character dialog!
>
> However, I noticed that the border of the dialog is not shown correctly
> at the height of "Language:". I suspected that the box has been specified
> in
Hi,
thanks for fixing the alignment of "Language:" in the character dialog!
However, I noticed that the border of the dialog is not shown correctly
at the height of "Language:". I suspected that the box has been specified
incorrectly (too much to the left) and had a short look at
"form_character
