On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:57:45PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Now I don't understand anymore why you want to scale bitmap icons?
>
> Peter> I don't like the big toolbars, and don't care about the
> Peter> artifacts of the
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 11:34:17AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Anyway, here it looks like Qt is wasting space, there
> is alway a unnecessary big border around the pictures.
That's not Qt's doing. I have tight 16x16 toolbars with
any Qt 3.3.x/4.x
Andre'
Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2006 09:51 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> What exactly is it that we would like to be done?
>
> If we can describe the task in detail, maybe there is someone on the
> users' list that would like to help? (I assume the task requires some
> graphic...)
Yes, it does. The d
Michael Gerz wrote:
What is the standard icon size for KDE/Windows applications?
There are four sizes of Windows icons—48 × 48, 32 × 32, 24 × 24, and 16
× 16 pixels.
more info here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwxp/html/winxpicons.asp
Starting with v
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What is your favourite size, BTW?
>> Peter> I think 26 for the normal size and 20 for the small size should
>> Peter> be ok on Windows.
>>
>> Peter> The Qt default is 24, but it seems
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> What is your favourite size, BTW?
>
> Peter> I think 26 for the normal size and 20 for the small size should
> Peter> be ok on Windows.
>
> Peter> The Qt default is 24, but it seems too small for some ma
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What is your favourite size, BTW?
Peter> I think 26 for the normal size and 20 for the small size should
Peter> be ok on Windows.
Peter> The Qt default is 24, but it seems too small for some math
Peter> icons, see the math_24.png.
Pet
I've checked in a patch which adds a tool bar popup with
three icon sizes: small, normal, big. Default is normal,
and should look like lyx 1.4.
At the moment we don't have SVG icons, also the icons
don't have all the same size, so I think this is the
best we could do for now.
Peter
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Peter> But some people like smaller (sub-optimal-scaled) icons, it was
>> Peter> already requested on the list. And nobody is forced to change
>> Peter> the size when he doesn't like it.
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Georg Baum wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
> > The Qt default is 24, but it seems too small for some math icons,
> > see the math_24.png.
>
> Yes, some math icons are too big (partly my doing, but I tought that
> would be better than no icons at all). We really need somebody
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> The Qt default is 24, but it seems too small for some math icons,
> see the math_24.png.
Yes, some math icons are too big (partly my doing, but I tought that would
be better than no icons at all). We really need somebody to go over all
icons and make them consistent.
Georg
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
Peter> I don't like the big toolbars, and don't care about the
Peter> artifacts of the scaled-down bitmaps.
What size is a 'big' toolbar to you?
One problem is that our icons have different sizes (from 20x20 to
at least 26x26 from what I can see).
Can't we tell qt
Here the next proposal:
* two sizes: big and small
* hard coded platform specific sizes in GuiView.C
(is this a good idea?)
* session file value is alway possible
* choosing small/big overwrites session file value
Peter
Index: src/frontends/qt4/GuiView.h
==
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Now I don't understand anymore why you want to scale bitmap icons?
>
> Peter> I don't like the big toolbars, and don't care about the
> Peter> artifacts of the scaled-down bitmaps.
>
> What size is a 'bi
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Can't we just force qt to use the size we provide?
Peter> I've committed a patch, so we can now hard code the icon size
Peter> in lyx_main.C. Currently it is iconSizeXY = 26, hope this is
Peter> correc
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> But some people like smaller (sub-optimal-scaled) icons, it was
Peter> already requested on the list. And nobody is forced to change
Peter> the size when he doesn't like it.
A rule of thumb of interface design is to avoid adding pre
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Now I don't understand anymore why you want to scale bitmap icons?
Peter> I don't like the big toolbars, and don't care about the
Peter> artifacts of the scaled-down bitmaps.
What size is a 'big' toolbar to you?
One problem is that ou
Georg Baum wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
>> Georg Baum wrote:
>>
>>> Or we convert the icons to SVG (AFAIK qt 4 can use SVG icons). Then it
>>> would make sense to scale them, but we should not offre that for bitmap
>>> icons.
>> But I doubt that it makes sense to scale at this small sizes.
>> It
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>
>> Or we convert the icons to SVG (AFAIK qt 4 can use SVG icons). Then it
>> would make sense to scale them, but we should not offre that for bitmap
>> icons.
>
> But I doubt that it makes sense to scale at this small sizes.
> It's the same problem like
Georg Baum wrote:
> Or we convert the icons to SVG (AFAIK qt 4 can use SVG icons). Then it would
> make sense to scale them, but we should not offre that for bitmap icons.
But I doubt that it makes sense to scale at this small sizes.
It's the same problem like with fonts. Only hand adjusted is
op
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Can't we just
> force qt to use the size we provide?
I've committed a patch, so we can now hard code
the icon size in lyx_main.C.
Currently it is iconSizeXY = 26, hope this is
correct.
If someone wants a other size he could hack
the session file after the first LyX c
Georg Baum wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> I do not think we should catter for all possible sizes? Can't we just
>> force qt to use the size we provide?
>
> I would prefer that, too. The scaled icons look horrible here, some are not
> even recognizable.
But some people like smaller (su
Georg Baum wrote:
> Or we convert the icons to SVG (AFAIK qt 4 can use SVG icons).
That would be great (for 1.6, though).
Jürgen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I do not think we should catter for all possible sizes? Can't we just
> force qt to use the size we provide?
I would prefer that, too. The scaled icons look horrible here, some are not
even recognizable.
> If we provide different sets of
> icons later, we will look
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Peter> Here a patch which makes the toolbar icon size changeable. The
> Peter> size could be changed by the toolbar popup menu. It also saves
> Peter> the size when quiting and restores it the next time open
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Here a patch which makes the toolbar icon size changeable. The
Peter> size could be changed by the toolbar popup menu. It also saves
Peter> the size when quiting and restores it the next time opening
Peter> lyx.
I do not think we sh
Here a patch which makes the toolbar icon size changeable.
The size could be changed by the toolbar popup menu.
It also saves the size when quiting and restores it the
next time opening lyx.
This are the related Status.15x items:
* Icons in the toolbars do not have the correct size, they are str
27 matches
Mail list logo
