Michael Gerz wrote:
> IMHO, "find & replace" should always ignore deleted text, in CT mode as
> well as in non-CT mode.
That's what my patch does. I'm just waiting for your testing.
Jürgen
Helge Hafting schrieb:
If you turn off change tracking and edit, then surely all new stuff
should
be without the change tracking markings. (i.e. not deleted or marked
as inserted by someone.) You may be able to add inside a deleted region,
but that should split the deleted region in two.
That'
Bennett Helm schrieb:
I agree with the last sentence, but notice that the patch doesn't do
this! When change tracking is turned off, it is entirely possible to
delete -- remove from the file -- text that is marked as deleted.
Right. Even if we prohibited it, the user may always accept deleted te
On Jun 8, 2007, at 3:16 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I think we should restrict manual replace too (if possible). It
should
not be allowed to do with replace something that would not be
possible
via normal editing.
attached is a complete patch that includes ma
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think we should restrict manual replace too (if possible). It should
> not be allowed to do with replace something that would not be possible
> via normal editing.
attached is a complete patch that includes manual replace (but not, editing).
Jürgen
Index: src/lyxfi
Jürgen Spitzmüller schrieb:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I think we should restrict manual replace too (if possible). It should
not be allowed to do with replace something that would not be possible
via normal editing.
Probably. Although OpenOffice allows this (and so does Word). Howeve
On Jun 6, 2007, at 4:38 AM, Helge Hafting wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Jun 5, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Bennett Helm wrote:
Create a document with multiple occurrences of "foo". Turn change
tracking on,
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Jun 5, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Bennett Helm wrote:
Create a document with multiple occurrences of "foo". Turn change
tracking on, select a chunk of text (including some occurrences
On Jun 5, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Bennett Helm wrote:
Create a document with multiple occurrences of "foo". Turn change
tracking on, select a chunk of text (including some occurrences of
"foo"), and del
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think we should restrict manual replace too (if possible). It should
> not be allowed to do with replace something that would not be possible
> via normal editing.
Probably. Although OpenOffice allows this (and so does Word). However, we are
not forced to emulate t
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Bennett Helm wrote:
>> Create a document with multiple occurrences of "foo". Turn change
>> tracking on, select a chunk of text (including some occurrences of
>> "foo"), and delete. Now go to the top and turn change track
Bennett Helm wrote:
> Create a document with multiple occurrences of "foo". Turn change
> tracking on, select a chunk of text (including some occurrences of
> "foo"), and delete. Now go to the top and turn change tracking *off*.
> Using Edit > Find & Replace, Replace all instances of "foo" wi
I just noticed that searching for and replacing text interacts with
change tracking in an unexpected way.
Create a document with multiple occurrences of "foo". Turn change
tracking on, select a chunk of text (including some occurrences of
"foo"), and delete. Now go to the top and turn chang
13 matches
Mail list logo
