Re: Building LyX from shared libraries

2010-01-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Abdelrazak Younes writes: > Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: >> There is no explanation for why libtool was removed last year. Does >> anyone know? >> > > Because it slows down compilation a lot. And there was no evidence that we really needed it. JMarc

Re: Building LyX from shared libraries

2010-01-05 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: Hi developers, I just successfully completed an experiment with using libtool to build all LyX component libraries as shared libraries and building the lyx executable to link with these instead of the static libs. Is this something that might be worth submitting? W

Re: Building LyX from shared libraries

2010-01-05 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: There is no explanation for why libtool was removed last year. Does anyone know? Because it slows down compilation a lot. Abdel.

Re: Building LyX from shared libraries

2010-01-04 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
There is no explanation for why libtool was removed last year. Does anyone know? -- Manoj On Monday 04 January 2010 12:44:27 pm Pavel Sanda wrote: > Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: > > 6. Has someone tried all this before? What was the experience then? > > http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/27468 > pa

Re: Building LyX from shared libraries

2010-01-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: > 6. Has someone tried all this before? What was the experience then? http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/27468 pavel

Building LyX from shared libraries

2010-01-04 Thread Manoj Rajagopalan
Hi developers, I just successfully completed an experiment with using libtool to build all LyX component libraries as shared libraries and building the lyx executable to link with these instead of the static libs. Is this something that might be worth submitting? With libtool, by default, bo