Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> I do not see why setting SHELL to some bogus value does not work
>>> as expected.
>
> Angus> Running 'exec false' from the terminal just closes the
> Angus> terminal. Ie, the action is executed successfully...
>
> And? How comes i eventually excutes the ls?
The 'e
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> /* What does EXEC expand to. It's done only once, so
Angus> let's assume it is 'exec'. */
Sorry, I forgot the following line:
#define EXEC "exec "
>> I do not see why setting SHELL to some bogus value does not work as
>> ex
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Does this not mean that you're using /bin/echo rather than
> the Angus> echo built into bash?
>
> I should not. Here is what I believe to be the relevant code in
> gnuplot 3.7.1 (in command.c):
>
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Does this not mean that you're using /bin/echo rather than the
Angus> echo built into bash?
I should not. Here is what I believe to be the relevant code in
gnuplot 3.7.1 (in command.c):
static void do_shell()
{
static char exe
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think you are trying to be too sophisticated here (and this is
> always asking for trouble). The "help environment" pages of gnuplot
> suggests that the shell functionality honors the SHELL environment
> variable (and indeed the code in command.c seems to do just tha
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Sunday 18 April 2004 6:16 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> I had a quick look at the gnuplot help system and did not find
>> anything suitable.
Angus> What we could do is write a gnuplot_wrapper.sh script that
Angus> simply substitut
On Sunday 18 April 2004 8:46 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> There's an explicit 'shell' command in gnuplot, too, and maybe
> 'save' should be forbidden, too.
>
> I wonder whether the better solution would be to ask the gnuplot
> people to provide a 'secure' mode. The splash screen says:
>
> Send comm
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 07:42:29PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Sunday 18 April 2004 6:16 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:03:55PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > > Gnuplot would be nice.
> > >
> > > But gnuplot allows the user to invoke the shell. It's not hard to
> >
On Sunday 18 April 2004 6:16 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:03:55PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Gnuplot would be nice.
> >
> > But gnuplot allows the user to invoke the shell. It's not hard to
> > imagine a script containing the line '!rm -rf $HOME/*'. Does it
> > have
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:03:55PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Gnuplot would be nice.
>
> But gnuplot allows the user to invoke the shell. It's not hard to
> imagine a script containing the line '!rm -rf $HOME/*'. Does it have
> a '-safer' mode so that we can render malicious scripts safe?
Do
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> We have this already, though well hidden )-: . Try
>> insert->file->external material, and choose the XFig template. XFig
>> is a drawing program.
>>
>> It is possible to add other drawing programs to "external
>> material".
Yes. See file ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/external_mater
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 08:56:43AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 02:29:14AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thusly:
> >
> > To whom it may consern,
> >
> > I thought i would be nice if Lyx would have a link to a program witch abell to
> > drow function, so you wouldnt need
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 02:29:14AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thusly:
>
> To whom it may consern,
>
> I thought i would be nice if Lyx would have a link to a program witch abell to
> drow function, so you wouldnt need to creat the function and export it to eps
> or othere format and import it
To whom it may consern,
I thought i would be nice if Lyx would have a link to a program witch abell to
drow function, so you wouldnt need to creat the function and export it to eps
or othere format and import it.
Hannan
14 matches
Mail list logo
