Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:32:25AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: | > Helge Hafting wrote: | > > Now, if we had a way of starting the selection | > > before the numeral/bullet/section-number but after | > > the previous paragraph.  I.e. an extra curs

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:32:25AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Helge Hafting wrote: > > Now, if we had a way of starting the selection > > before the numeral/bullet/section-number but after > > the previous paragraph.  I.e. an extra cursor position. > > Then the user gets a better way of d

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-09 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Helge Hafting wrote: > "Adding an enabled branch around any selection should not > affect output at all, and disabling the branch should affect > output the same way as a cut would". Agreed. > I don't think this will be possible in absolutely all cases though. > Removing a list item that has an e

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-09 Thread Helge Hafting
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:32:25AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Helge Hafting wrote: > > Now, if we had a way of starting the selection > > before the numeral/bullet/section-number but after > > the previous paragraph.  I.e. an extra cursor position. > > Then the user gets a better way of d

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-09 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Helge Hafting wrote: > Now, if we had a way of starting the selection > before the numeral/bullet/section-number but after > the previous paragraph.  I.e. an extra cursor position. > Then the user gets a better way of deciding whether > an enumeration goes inside the box or if we > just have a boxe

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-05 Thread Helge Hafting
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Helge Hafting wrote: Looks like a bad idea, unless I misunderstand something. Please test my patch, then you'll see what it does without guessing. 2. The user marks a whole paragraph, or several. In this case, the user clearly want to stuff the list

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-04 Thread Martin Vermeer
... > Looks like a bad idea, unless I misunderstand something. > This will break a trivial case of putting an entire enumeration > into a box, for example. > > Before box: > 1. one > 2. two > 3. three > Mark everything, insert a box, get: > 1. [box starts here > one > a) two > b) th

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-04 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Helge Hafting wrote: > Looks like a bad idea, unless I misunderstand something. Please test my patch, then you'll see what it does without guessing. > 2. The user marks a whole paragraph, or several. > In this case, the user clearly want to stuff the list (or whatever) > into the box/bran

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-04 Thread Helge Hafting
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:43:51 +0200 Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:31:05 +0200 Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... I agree it needs fixing, but how? This is sensible b

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-03 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Ah, great that you found that old one. Do I guess right from reading the > patch that bug 1332 remains fixed, i.e., does not come unfixed? Yes. I just restored to the old behaviour (not copying the layout for the first paragraph in an empty target paragraph) in the case of

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-03 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 04:30:04PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Fair enough... but could you put a link to this discussion > > on bugzilla? > > Finally, I couldn't resist. See attached patch (against trunk). Please test > someone. > BTW this bug is a consequence

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-02 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Fair enough... but could you put a link to this discussion > on bugzilla? Finally, I couldn't resist. See attached patch (against trunk). Please test someone. BTW this bug is a consequence of the fix for bug 1332. Jürgen Index: src/CutAndPaste.C ==

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-01 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 19:01:29 +0200 Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > This should be implemented at the point where, when inserting a > textinset > > with the selection active, the selection is moved to a buffer. I > would tell > > you where that is, but I

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > This should be implemented at the point where, when inserting a textinset > with the selection active, the selection is moved to a buffer. I would tell > you where that is, but I am writing this on an 3x8 cm "soft keybord" of my > Nokia 770 from my WLAN-enabled hotel room in

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-01 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:41:55PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > This problem is much more genersl than branches. It was reported > earlier on the list: selecting text in a itemise/enum pararaph, and > inserting a textinset around it, will produce a item/enum paragraph > inside the inset. > > I a

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-01 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:43:51 +0200 Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:31:05 +0200 Helge Hafting > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > ... > > I agree it needs fixing, but how? This is sensible behaviour when > putting an > > n

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-09-01 Thread Helge Hafting
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:31:05 +0200 Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From reading the related bug reports 2093 and 2671, I know there is some problems with branches & lists. This is about branch stuff that can be done, but in an unnecessarily cumbersome and su

Re: Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-08-31 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:31:05 +0200 Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From reading the related bug reports 2093 and 2671, I know there is > some problems with branches & lists. This is about branch stuff that > can > be done, but in an unnecessarily cumbersome and surprising way. > >

Bug 2802: Cumbersome use of insert->branch in lists.

2006-08-30 Thread Helge Hafting
From reading the related bug reports 2093 and 2671, I know there is some problems with branches & lists. This is about branch stuff that can be done, but in an unnecessarily cumbersome and surprising way. I write multilingual documents, where each list item is in two languages. The document sh