> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> Yes, we shall remove
>>>
>>> cmd = FuncRequest(LFUN_FINISHED_LEFT);
>>> cur.undispatched();
Juergen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This fixes the leaving of inset, and also the selection of
> not-so-small atoms.
>
> Please test.
Looks good as far as I have tested. But be good if Daniel would test it as
well, though, for I'm a bit short on time ATM.
Jürgen
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Yes, we shall remove
>>
>> cmd = FuncRequest(LFUN_FINISHED_LEFT);
>> cur.undispatched();
Juergen> OK. Do you happen to have a patch in hand?
OK, you win :)
This fixes t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, we shall remove
>
> cmd = FuncRequest(LFUN_FINISHED_LEFT);
> cur.undispatched();
OK. Do you happen to have a patch in hand?
> Juergen> Also, is this correct?
>
> Juergen> default:
> Juergen> MathDimInset::doDispatch(cur, cmd);
> Juerge
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> 2/ the fact that the cursor moves outside of the inset. A delete
>> bug IMO.
Juergen> No surprise I think. Have a look at
Juergen> math_nestInset::doDispatch:
Yes, we shall remove
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 2/ the fact that the cursor moves outside of the inset. A delete bug
> IMO.
No surprise I think. Have a look at math_nestInset::doDispatch:
case LFUN_DELETE_WORD_FORWARD:
case LFUN_DELETE:
recordUndo(cur);
cur.erase();
cmd = FuncRequest(LFUN_F
> "Daniel" == Daniel Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> Angus said I should send a message here if I reported a bug in
Daniel> the cvs code, so I'm doing so. In this case, 1.4.0cvs of 27/9
Daniel> (or 9/27, depending on your location).
Daniel> Bug 2057 (http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_b
Daniel Watkins wrote:
> Angus said I should send a message here if I reported a bug in the cvs
> code, so I'm doing so. In this case, 1.4.0cvs of 27/9 (or 9/27,
> depending on your location).
>
> Bug 2057 (http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2057): Delete key
> acting unexpectedly in MathEd
>
Angus said I should send a message here if I reported a bug in the cvs
code, so I'm doing so. In this case, 1.4.0cvs of 27/9 (or 9/27,
depending on your location).
Bug 2057 (http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2057): Delete key
acting unexpectedly in MathEd
Description: When the Delete key is
