John Levon wrote:
> can we standardise on one or the other please ? (personally asking the
> painter for metrics info seems odd)
> For both width and height, that is
Yes but you should wait for Lars as I already did such a proposal
and he didn't like it, so ...
> Why can't this list of rows be
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:14:42PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Have a look at insettabular::draw(...) it is:
>
> bv->painter().paperHeight()
can we standardise on one or the other please ? (personally asking the
painter for metrics info seems odd)
For both width and height, that is
Why can'
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 2:14 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Have a look at insettabular::draw(...) it is:
>
> bv->painter().paperHeight()
>
> Hope this helps!
Proof that being noisy and asking questions leads to success!
Thank you.
A
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Am I right in saying that there's no way of accessing this info from
outside
> at the moment?
Have a look at insettabular::draw(...) it is:
bv->painter().paperHeight()
Hope this helps!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 2:08 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:40:40PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Any objection to me adding this, analogous to the existing workWidth
> > method?
>
> Not really. But that's not my play ground...
>
> Andre'
It is if you want an efficient
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:40:40PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Any objection to me adding this, analogous to the existing workWidth method?
Not really. But that's not my play ground...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve
Am I right in saying that there's no way of accessing this info from outside
at the moment?
Any objection to me adding this, analogous to the existing workWidth method?
int BufferView::workHeight() const
{
return pimpl_->workarea().workHeight();
}
I'd like to use it for this:
typedef
