> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Have we missed this patch? Michael
Are you sure? Check again.
JMarc ;)
Have we missed this patch?
Michael
John McCabe-Dansted schrieb:
In BufferList::updateIncludedTeXfiles we have
string writefile = mastertmpdir;
writefile += '/';
writefile += (*it)->getLatexName();
As per our discussions re: the ChkTeX patch the above looks in
In BufferList::updateIncludedTeXfiles we have
string writefile = mastertmpdir;
writefile += '/';
writefile += (*it)->getLatexName();
As per our discussions re: the ChkTeX patch the above looks incorrect
to me. The following looks better:
string writef
need some reworking. Until then I think we have to keep this
> func.
The reason I asked is that I was rewriting the included document code, in
order to fix some bugs: I was able to fix the bug with 2 (or more) levels of
include. Because I couldn't understand why the
BufferList::updateInclude
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Why do we need this method ?
Yes, I think we do.
The parent/child system for included documents is not very well though
out and need some reworking. Until then I think we have to keep this
func.
Lgb
Why do we need this method ?
