2.3.x is open again. The release will happen in the next couple days.
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I don't agree. The tarball simply misses files. Adding them so that people
> can use the tarball to compile the beta is in my opinion essential. This
> does not change any code and thus it would still be beta 1.
The proper way how to do this is to fix it and release beta2, no
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 04:57:33PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > If I misunderstood something and there is agreement that the beta1 tar
> > ball should be changed, let me know.
>
> Once you put it on public ftp it will start to spread without our control,
> so we shouldn't
Am 11.02.2016 um 01:48 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
Thanks for the fixes. I'm not planning on changing the beta1 tar ball
because that would be changing the code so it wouldn't be beta1 anymore.
I don't agree. The tarball simply misses files. Adding them so that
people can use the tarball to comp
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> If I misunderstood something and there is agreement that the beta1 tar
> ball should be changed, let me know.
Once you put it on public ftp it will start to spread without our control,
so we shouldn't change the tarball.
> It's good to know that the tar ball will be fixed
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:36:00AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 10.02.2016 um 04:00 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> >The beta1 tag and tar is complete.
>
> OK, I committed now some fixes and improvements for the installer. When you
> fix the tarball, these could go in there if you like.
Thanks for
Am 10.02.2016 um 04:00 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
The beta1 tag and tar is complete.
OK, I committed now some fixes and improvements for the installer. When
you fix the tarball, these could go in there if you like.
regards Uwe
The beta1 tag and tar is complete.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Le 17/11/2015 16:54, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I see. Someday it would be nice to mark places in our code that make
somewhat arbitrary decisions. The next step would be to implement some
sort of mechanism that would produce a debug log (only enabled for devel
mode) that would give information on
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 09:04:13AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 17/11/2015 01:38, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >>1 << 19 is a 1 with 19 zeros after it, in binary notation, so is equivalent
> >>to 2^19 = 512K but much faster to calculate. This trick is used extensively
> >>in debug.h.
> >
Le 15/11/2015 18:05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 14/11/2015 05:13, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I have tagged and tarred (and signed) alpha1. I will upload the tarballs
soon.
Development is open for post-alpha commits.
So can we just commit as we see fit, or would you like stuff to go to
m
Le 17/11/2015 01:38, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
1 << 19 is a 1 with 19 zeros after it, in binary notation, so is equivalent
to 2^19 = 512K but much faster to calculate. This trick is used extensively
in debug.h.
Thanks for this explanation, Richard. Now I understand.
I'm still curious how 512K
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 01:20:11PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 11/15/2015 05:27 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> >The following is not a critique (so please push because of Richard's
> >positive feedback), but if you have time I am curious about the following:
> >
> >strwidth_cache_(1 << 19)
>
On 11/15/2015 05:27 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
The following is not a critique (so please push because of Richard's positive
feedback), but if you have time I am curious about the following:
strwidth_cache_(1 << 19)
How did you decide on 19? And why the trick of 1 << 19 instead of just the
f
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:18:28PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 11/15/2015 12:05 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 14/11/2015 05:13, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> I have tagged and tarred
> > (and signed) alpha1. I will upload the
> tarballs >> soon. >> >> Development is open for post-alpha
On 11/15/2015 12:05 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 14/11/2015 05:13, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> I have tagged and tarred
> (and signed) alpha1. I will upload the
tarballs >> soon. >> >> Development is open for post-alpha commits. > >
So can we just commit as we see fit, or would you like s
Le 14/11/2015 05:13, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I have tagged and tarred (and signed) alpha1. I will upload the tarballs
soon.
Development is open for post-alpha commits.
So can we just commit as we see fit, or would you like stuff to go to
mailing list first? First example would be the follow
I have tagged and tarred (and signed) alpha1. I will upload the tarballs
soon.
Development is open for post-alpha commits.
Scott
As said.
There were quite a few bugs with 2.1.3 milestones that have been fixed
in master. You may get emails about these. It'd be nice to get the fixes
pushed to stable if possible as early as we can.
Richard
again for 2.1.2 commits, under the usual rules. 2.1.1 release will come
shortly. Uwe is traveling, so he can't do the Windows build until Tuesday.
Richard
Branch is open. I'll do the official release this weekend.
Richard
Branch is again open for commits, as LyX 2.0.1 is out.
Richard
22 matches
Mail list logo
