Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Better is to switch to tr1, and as fallback to use an external boost
>> tr1 implementation.
>
> The part that is problematic for stdlib-debug, I think, is boost::regex.
> Does tr1 contain something like that?
Yes, but it is not 100% source compatible (at least with
Peter Kümmel writes:
> Better is to switch to tr1, and as fallback to use an external boost
> tr1 implementation.
The part that is problematic for stdlib-debug, I think, is boost::regex.
Does tr1 contain something like that?
We could also:
- have external-boost be the default for releases
- hav
Pavel Sanda writes:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> >An easier long-term fix (for branch) would be to make
>> >--with-external-boost the default.
>>
>> Yes, but for now, I'd prefer another upgrade.
>
> so we can do it for trunk now?
As I wrote, this kills stdlib-debug (unless distribs also provi
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >> I think we should do that. Peter, could you perform the boost upgrade
> >> for branch?
>
> Done, branch now compiles with gcc 4.4.1.
Thanks.
Jürgen
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> An easier long-term fix (for branch) would be to make
> --with-external-boost the default.
>
Better is to switch to tr1, and as fallback to use an external boost tr1
implementation.
Peter
>> I think we should do that. Peter, could you perform the boost upgrade
>> for branch?
Done, branch now compiles with gcc 4.4.1.
Peter
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > >An easier long-term fix (for branch) would be to make
> > >--with-external-boost the default.
> >
> >
> > Yes, but for now, I'd prefer another upgrade.
>
> so we can do it for trunk now?
Dunno.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> >An easier long-term fix (for branch) would be to make
> >--with-external-boost the default.
>
> Yes, but for now, I'd prefer another upgrade.
so we can do it for trunk now?
pavel
Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> svn propset svn:externals "boost
> http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/tags/release/Boost_1_40_0/boost"; config
>
> checks out the boost headers into the config folder.
> But it checks out all boost headers, 90MB instead of 16 MB.
This is certainly a problem.
Abdel wrote:
>An
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Peter Kuemmel wrote:
I've updated LyX's boost to version 1.40, and it compiles here on
Ubuntu with gcc 4.4.1.
Does this solve the problem?
I think we should do that. Peter, could you perform the boost upgrade for
branch?
An easier long-term fix (for b
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:22:22 +0100
> Von: "Jürgen Spitzmüller"
> An: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
> CC: "Peter Kuemmel" , rgheck
> Betreff: Re: Boost And Compilation
> Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> > I've updated
Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> I've updated LyX's boost to version 1.40, and it compiles here on
> Ubuntu with gcc 4.4.1.
>
> Does this solve the problem?
I think we should do that. Peter, could you perform the boost upgrade for
branch?
Jürgen
External boost breaks stdlib-debug, for a start.
How much does stdlib-debug give beyond what a run through valgrind
might
reveal?
Probably not much, but at least it jumps in the face of people who are
not prepared
to run valgrind. So it is better at telling you that there is a bug,
but
.
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:37:10 -0500
> Von: rgheck
> An: LyX Developers
> Betreff: Boost And Compilation
>
> We should add a note to INSTALL or README about the problem compiling
> LyX with included boost with gcc 4.4.
>
&
We should add a note to INSTALL or README about the problem compiling
LyX with included boost with gcc 4.4.
rh
15 matches
Mail list logo
