On Monday, May 24, 2021 8:18:31 PM WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I have put tarballs for beta 1 here:
>
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Zl_20mzi9ndDDQdzeFyvR07O4lLDtcW3?usp
> =sharing
>
> I need to get my IP updated with our FTP people before
Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 22:49 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin :
> Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 20:17 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin :
>
>> Am Mo., 24. Mai 2021 um 21:18 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck <
>> rikih...@lyx.org>:
>>
>>> Hi, all,
>>>
>>> I have put tarba
Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 20:17 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin :
> Am Mo., 24. Mai 2021 um 21:18 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck <
> rikih...@lyx.org>:
>
>> Hi, all,
>>
>> I have put tarballs for beta 1 here:
>>
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/drive/fo
Am Mo., 24. Mai 2021 um 21:18 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck <
rikih...@lyx.org>:
> Hi, all,
>
> I have put tarballs for beta 1 here:
>
>
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Zl_20mzi9ndDDQdzeFyvR07O4lLDtcW3?usp=sharing
>
> I need to get my IP updated wi
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 03:18:31PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I have put tarballs for beta 1 here:
>
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Zl_20mzi9ndDDQdzeFyvR07O4lLDtcW3?usp=sharing
Seems to work on several different debian versions.
ANNOUNCE file
Am Mo., 24. Mai 2021 um 21:18 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck <
rikih...@lyx.org>:
> Hi, all,
>
> I have put tarballs for beta 1 here:
>
>
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Zl_20mzi9ndDDQdzeFyvR07O4lLDtcW3?usp=sharing
>
> I need to get my IP updated wi
Hi, all,
I have put tarballs for beta 1 here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Zl_20mzi9ndDDQdzeFyvR07O4lLDtcW3?usp=sharing
I need to get my IP updated with our FTP people before I can upload
again to ftp.lyx.org. Usually that does not take too long. In any event,
please prepare
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 02:25:11AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> So how about a Beta 1 soon?
Great idea, we should announce epub export available to get some testing.
> I guess that means total feature freeze and only serious bug fixes in master.
Feature freeze definitely, I would
Le 11/04/2021 à 08:25, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
Got kind of busy last month, but that has left some time for testing,
and we seem not to have gotten too many reports of regressions. So how
about a Beta 1 soon? I guess that means total feature freeze and only
serious bug fixes in master
Got kind of busy last month, but that has left some time for testing,
and we seem not to have gotten too many reports of regressions. So how
about a Beta 1 soon? I guess that means total feature freeze and only
serious bug fixes in master. Do we start translations then? with the
understanding that
Am Dienstag, dem 26.01.2021 um 10:32 +0200 schrieb Dr Eberhard Lisse:
> to be honest ePub support is a killer feature (even for non-
> publishing users like me) and hence I'd really would like to see it
> making it into 2.4.
With this argumentation a release can be delayed ad infinitum. Having
wri
Jürgen,
to be honest ePub support is a killer feature (even for non-publishing
users like me) and hence I'd really would like to see it making it into
2.4.
Alpha/Beta doesn't matter to me as I can't make the switch (new file
structure?) until it is production ready (or 2.3.7 (?) can read 2.4
fil
On Monday, January 25, 2021 6:59:02 PM WET Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> I would really like to ship an ePub export in 2.4, building upon the DocBook
> export. I think I could work on that this week.
In the interest of the discussion what needs to be done here?
That is how do you intend to implement
Am Montag, dem 25.01.2021 um 19:52 + schrieb José Abílio Matos:
> On Monday, January 25, 2021 7:26:34 PM WET Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > But I don't think it matters much in the end,
> > Pavel
>
> I agree with Pavel here. :-)
Me, too. I would add that we shouldn't wait too long for new features.
S
On Monday, January 25, 2021 7:26:34 PM WET Pavel Sanda wrote:
> But I don't think it matters much in the end,
> Pavel
I agree with Pavel here. :-)
--
José Abílio--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 07:59:02PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> > A couple fairly significant regressions have now been fixed in Alpha 1,
> > so it looks like time to do another release. The default would be to go
> > with Alpha 2. But, besides some missing layout files (my fault) and a
> > pro
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 19:31, Richard Kimberly Heck
wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> A couple fairly significant regressions have now been fixed in Alpha 1,
> so it looks like time to do another release. The default would be to go
> with Alpha 2. But, besides some missing layout files (my fault) and a
> pro
Hi, all,
A couple fairly significant regressions have now been fixed in Alpha 1,
so it looks like time to do another release. The default would be to go
with Alpha 2. But, besides some missing layout files (my fault) and a
problem opening files, we have not had any serious bug reports from
Alpha 1
Kornel Benko wrote:
> We may want to unify the output of msgmerge to possibly minimize the
> differences in po-files.
We tried and were not capable to unify it on Uwe's box, I am not going into the
same debate again so it's completely your call. P
Am Montag, 4. September 2017 um 02:28:33, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:11:55PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 31. August 2017 um 13:07:46, schrieb Pavel Sanda
> >
> > > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:11:55PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 31. August 2017 um 13:07:46, schrieb Pavel Sanda
>
> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to
> > > > worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs:
Am Donnerstag, 31. August 2017 um 13:07:46, schrieb Pavel Sanda
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to
> > > worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs:
> > > $ git diff-tree -r -c -M -C --no-commit-id cf5d9e1 |acut -f 4 | g
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to
> > > worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs:
> > > $ git diff-tree -r -c -M -C --no-commit-id cf5d9e1 |acut -f 4 | git
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to
> > worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs:
> > $ git diff-tree -r -c -M -C --no-commit-id cf5d9e1 |acut -f 4 | git
> > cat-file --batch-check |acut -f 3|asum
> > 45175575
>
> 45MB for
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 04:48:36PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > b) git archive become easily huge just because of such changes
> >
> > Do frequent commits of .gmo files significantly increase git archive?
>
> I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likel
On 08/30/2017 04:32 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:08:52PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> I think I have a fundamental misunderstanding. I thought that strings
>>> were supposed to be remerged before asking translators for translations.
>>> Then the
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > b) git archive become easily huge just because of such changes
>
> Do frequent commits of .gmo files significantly increase git archive?
I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to
worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs:
$ git dif
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:08:52PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I think I have a fundamental misunderstanding. I thought that strings
> > were supposed to be remerged before asking translators for translations.
> > Then the translator returns the po file, and the po and th
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1
>
>
>
Ubuntu 'lyx2.3pre' packages are now available on the Development PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily
The packages install inde
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I think I have a fundamental misunderstanding. I thought that strings
> were supposed to be remerged before asking translators for translations.
> Then the translator returns the po file, and the po and the
> corresponding gmo files are committed. What is the purpose of rem
On 08/28/2017 01:09 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 03:23:42AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1
>> Scott, did you put on lyx wiki the release steps you are using when
>> releasing tarballs?
>> (If not, can you sha
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 03:23:42AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1
>
> Scott, did you put on lyx wiki the release steps you are using when releasing
> tarballs?
> (If not, can you share it there?)
I just updated the wiki with the ba
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1
Scott, did you put on lyx wiki the release steps you are using when releasing
tarballs?
(If not, can you share it there?)
It seems strings were not properly remerged for beta.
Pavel
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:41:44AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:38:04AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Miscellaneous, I would say.
>
> I added it.
Thanks,
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:38:04AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:33:51PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:47:59AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:06:06PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > > > On 17/08/2017 2
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:33:51PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:47:59AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:06:06PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > > On 17/08/2017 20:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > An overview of the new features can be
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:47:59AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:06:06PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > On 17/08/2017 20:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > An overview of the new features can be found here:
> > >
> > >http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX23
> >
> >
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:06:06PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 17/08/2017 20:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > An overview of the new features can be found here:
> >
> >http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX23
>
> AFAICR, the new shell-escape [+minted] support made it to the 2.3, but it's
>
On 17/08/2017 20:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
An overview of the new features can be found here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX23
AFAICR, the new shell-escape [+minted] support made it to the 2.3, but it's not
mentioned (yet).
T.
Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1
We are proud to announce the first public beta of the new LyX 2.3 series.
This pre-release is meant for testing and should not be used for serious work.
For curious users who would like to test in order to help catch
On 2016-02-11, Jürgen Lange wrote:
> The PDF Producer changed from Xetex 0.2 in 2.1.4. to MikTex-xdvipdfmx
> (20150315) in 2.2.0beta1.
This is rather due to an MikTex update. xdvipdfmx is the part of XeTeX that
transforms the intermediate format (XDVI) to PDF.
Günter
Jürgen Lange wrote:
> Hello,
> thank you very much for 2.2.0 beta 1.
> Compiling one of my documents does not work anymore in 2.2.0 beta 1. The
> format is PDF (XeTeX).
> The error-message is:
> Kann keinen Latex Befehl für das Zeichen ḫ (Code-Punkt 0x1e2b) finden.
>
The PDF Producer changed from Xetex 0.2 in 2.1.4. to MikTex-xdvipdfmx
(20150315) in 2.2.0beta1.
Hello,
thank you very much for 2.2.0 beta 1.
Compiling one of my documents does not work anymore in 2.2.0 beta 1. The
format is PDF (XeTeX).
The error-message is:
Kann keinen Latex Befehl für das Zeichen ḫ (Code-Punkt 0x1e2b) finden.
Einige Zeichen Ihres Dokuments sind mit der gewählten
Dear all,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 2.1.0beta1
>
>
Ubuntu binaries are now available on the Development PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/daily . Install 'lyx2.1pre -
2.1.0~
The latest version of libertine in MacTeX 2013 (updated with tlmgr)
lacks the file libertineMono-type1.sty.
I took libertineRoman-type1.sty, modified it accordingly, put it into my
local tree, texhashed, reconfigured LyX and it works.
Cool.
el
On 2013-08-01 10:40 , Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> Vi
Public release of LyX version 2.1.0beta1
We are proud to announce the first public beta release of the new LyX
2.1 series.
LyX 2.1.0beta1 is the culmination of two and half years of hard work.
This release is meant for testing before we actually release
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Development of new features and/or fixes that can wait for LyX 2.1.x, or
> 2.2.0, can take place in the new features repository.
IMHO it would be very good to concentrate on 2.1.0 and not to work on 2.2 or
2.1.x stuff at all until 2.1.0 is released. Otherwise it w
On May 22, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>> Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef:
>>>
>>> The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included?
>>> Jerry
>>
>> I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new
>>
Am 21.05.2013 10:32, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Please have a look at "http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21"; and help to complete
the list of new
features as much as possible. Maybe Uwe would also appreciate some help to
document the new features.
Please don't add anything to the UserGui
22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef:
The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included?
Jerry
I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new
feature or just a bugfix ?
I guess this is the patch from pdv we discussed in M
Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef:
The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included?
Jerry
I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new
feature or just a bugfix ?
Vincent
On May 21, 2013, at 1:32 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's Meeting and
> is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the first beta of LyX
> 2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime, the l
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > Also if you are heading towards final freezing it would be nicer if we know
> > the time schedule sooner than 2 weeks ahead.
> >
> Yes, a nice schedule is always better. On the other hand, if people do have
> new features that they definitely want to have in 2.1, t
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being
> > prepared for LyX2.1)
>
> I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files.
>
Is there any urgency to do this before
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being
> > prepared for LyX2.1)
>
> I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files.
>
> Next thing I would like to do after s
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being
> prepared for LyX2.1)
I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files.
Next thing I would like to do after string freeze is to go through all new
strings and check their corre
Dear all,
It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's
Meeting and is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the
first beta of LyX 2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime,
the last topics can be finished, the documentation can be updated, the
tr
> would you please prepare a windows installer for the new beta release
> 2.0.0 beta 2.
I'm wondering that people are so curious to test each and every brand-new development release
immediately.
Anyway, here it is:
http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117&release_id=1813
go2tob...@gmx.de wrote:
> Maybe it is the normal workflow, to prepare for linux and after 3 weeks
> have finished for windows? Or du you just have to push the green button
> ? :-)
the guys who are preparing installers are busy elsewhere outside lyx project.
so unless you want to step in for creat
Dear Lyx-developers,
would you please prepare a windows installer for the new beta release
2.0.0 beta 2.
I have no clue, if it is a lot of work to do this?
Maybe it is the normal workflow, to prepare for linux and after 3 weeks
have finished for windows? Or du you just have to push the green butto
Since the introduction of threaded export, the autosave function
didn't work anymore.
I fixed this in r36324-r36328.
Vincent
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 05:27:12 -0800 (PST)
>> "Marcelo" == Marcelo Acuña wrote:
Marcelo> My excuses by the false alarm. I am very ashamed for that reason.
No problem. It happens to everyone...we are just curios what has
happened with your cat? ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour | Hlapicina, Croa
> > During the course of the compilation it appeared a
>> message of error: segment violation.
> the only case i have seen such strange messages during
> compilation of anything was
> when my memory chipset got subverted. so maybe time to run
> memory check tests...
>
> the only other way i'm aw
Am 15.11.2010 um 13:20 schrieb Gour:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:15:39 -0800 (PST)
>>>>>>> "Marcelo" == Marcelo Acuña wrote:
>
> Marcelo> This morning I configured lyx beta 1 and start the compilation.
> Marcelo> During the course of the comp
Marcelo Acu?a wrote:
> This morning I configured lyx beta 1 and start the compilation.
> During the course of the compilation it appeared a message of error: segment
> violation.
the only case i have seen such strange messages during compilation of anything
was
when my memory ch
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:15:39 -0800 (PST)
>>>>>> "Marcelo" == Marcelo Acuña wrote:
Marcelo> This morning I configured lyx beta 1 and start the compilation.
Marcelo> During the course of the compilation it appeared a message of
Marcelo> error: segment viola
This morning I configured lyx beta 1 and start the compilation.
During the course of the compilation it appeared a message of error: segment
violation.
It was trying to read the error message when I noticed that the computer was
hung.
I reset it and now, during the starting, shows an error as if
Am 11.11.2010 um 07:42 schrieb Justin Wood:
> Hi gang. As LyX 2.0 beta 1 is now released, I thought I'd make the switch
> over (OS X 10.6).
Hi Justin, good to have brave users who are going to test beta release of LyX
2.0.
But it's beta and not clear exactly when the release w
Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 1)
==
We are pleased to announce the first public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0.
Development moved to the beta phase which basically means we will no
more include new features and focus on polishing the current ones.
We
José Matos wrote:
Hi,
temporarily I have placed the source for lyx-1.6.0beta1 in
http://lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6/
If it goes well we could/should announce it publically and then it would be
nice to have packages to test this under different scenarios. If the sources
have some unseen p
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:00 AM, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 31 May 2008 02:35:36 Bennett Helm wrote:
> >
> > This works for me. Thanks.
> >
> > Should we create the Mac binaries off of this? (The splash screen reads
> > 1.6.0svn.)
>
> If that is the case them lets us wai
Konrad Hofbauer wrote:
For cross-compiling PPC-Binaries on an Intel-Mac (which Bennett and me
need to do to create universal binaries for release), I need to set
export CFLAGS="-arch ppc" export CXXFLAGS="-arch ppc" export
LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -arch ppc"
and they automatically get passed to g+
On Saturday 31 May 2008 02:35:36 Bennett Helm wrote:
>
> This works for me. Thanks.
>
> Should we create the Mac binaries off of this? (The splash screen reads
> 1.6.0svn.)
If that is the case them lets us wait until Monday where I will tag a new
beta2 and where this problem is fixed. OK?
> Be
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > I can't compile on Mac; I get:
> > >
> > > Making all in po
> > > make LyX-1.6.pot-update
> > > make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../src/client/debug.cpp', needed
> by
> > > `LyX-1.6.pot-update'.
For cross-compiling PPC-Binaries on an Intel-Mac (which Bennett and me
need to do to create universal binaries for release), I need to set
export CFLAGS="-arch ppc"
export CXXFLAGS="-arch ppc"
export LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -arch ppc"
and they automatically get passed to g++, libtool, etc. (and w
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > I can't compile on Mac; I get:
> >
> > Making all in po
> > make LyX-1.6.pot-update
> > make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../src/client/debug.cpp', needed by
> > `LyX-1.6.pot-update'. Stop.
> > make[1]: *** [LyX-1.6.pot] Error 2
> > make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
the
rgheck wrote:
Konrad Hofbauer wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../src/client/debug.cpp', needed by
`LyX-1.6.pot-update'. Stop.
Try removing src/client/debug.cpp from POTFILES.in. I'm not sure what
the right fix is at the dist level, but that ought to do it.
T
> I can't compile on Mac; I get:
>
> Making all in po
> make LyX-1.6.pot-update
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../src/client/debug.cpp', needed by
> `LyX-1.6.pot-update'. Stop.
> make[1]: *** [LyX-1.6.pot] Error 2
> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
yep, you gave me a hint. i may be know
Konrad Hofbauer wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
I can't compile on Mac; I get:
Making all in po
make LyX-1.6.pot-update
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../src/client/debug.cpp', needed by
`LyX-1.6.pot-update'. Stop.
make[1]: *** [LyX-1.6.pot] Error 2
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
Exactly
Danny Ferrin wrote:
Hi, I am a regular lyx user here, and I use it regularly at university, it's
very helpful. I just wanted to congratulate you guys for all the excellent
work you've done with this program, it's a pure gem. Meanwhile, I would like
to make a suggestion. For th
Hi, I am a regular lyx user here, and I use it regularly at university, it's
very helpful. I just wanted to congratulate you guys for all the excellent
work you've done with this program, it's a pure gem. Meanwhile, I would like
to make a suggestion. For the beta 1 of Lyx 1.6
Bennett Helm wrote:
I can't compile on Mac; I get:
Making all in po
make LyX-1.6.pot-update
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../src/client/debug.cpp', needed by
`LyX-1.6.pot-update'. Stop.
make[1]: *** [LyX-1.6.pot] Error 2
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
Exactly same here (Intel-Mac on
On Friday 30 May 2008 19:08:01 rgheck wrote:
> I think your platform is very similar to mine, but for what it's worth:
> it compiles fine here: Fedora 8, etc.
FWIW I have used to test both F9 and what will be F10 (rawhide).
> rh
--
José Abílio
José Matos wrote:
Hi,
temporarily I have placed the source for lyx-1.6.0beta1 in
http://lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6/
If it goes well we could/should announce it publically and then it would be
nice to have packages to test this under different scenarios. If the sources
have some unseen p
On Friday 30 May 2008 18:09:48 Bennett Helm wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:15 PM, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >temporarily I have placed the source for lyx-1.6.0beta1 in
> > http://lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6/
>
> I needed to use: http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6/
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:15 PM, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>temporarily I have placed the source for lyx-1.6.0beta1 in
> http://lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6/
I needed to use: http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6/
If it goes well we could/should announce it publicall
Hi,
temporarily I have placed the source for lyx-1.6.0beta1 in
http://lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6/
If it goes well we could/should announce it publically and then it
would be
nice to have packages to test this under different scenarios. If the sources
have some unseen problem I wou
As the title says.
--
José Abílio
José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 May 2008 10:38:06 José Matos wrote:
> The DNS goes crazy:
> $ svn up
> ssh: Could not resolve hostname svn.lyx.org: Name or service not known
> svn: Connection closed unexpectedly
echo 62.70.27.115 svn.lyx.org >>/etc/hosts
pavel
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 10:38:06 José Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> this is a short note to assure you that I intend to release beta 1
> tomorrow. This begs for patches that don't disturb the flow (compiling and
> running). If you have a huge patch please hold it on until after t
Hi,
this is a short note to assure you that I intend to release beta 1
tomorrow.
This begs for patches that don't disturb the flow (compiling and running). If
you have a huge patch please hold it on until after the release.
Regards,
--
José Abílio
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 04:01:19PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> I think that Abdel intended to send this message to the list and not just to
> me. :-)
>
> Because I am somebody, not anybody. ;-)
Anybody could have said that.
Andre'
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 23 May 2008 13:11:33 you wrote:
José Matos wrote:
Hi all,
I suggest to release beta 1 next Thursday, and from there to
release a new beta every 3 weeks until we are ready to go RC.
So from now on no major features are allowed.
Comments
On Friday 23 May 2008 13:11:33 you wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I suggest to release beta 1 next Thursday, and from there to
> > release a new beta every 3 weeks until we are ready to go RC.
> >
> > So from now on no major features ar
José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 23 May 2008 11:40:03 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > old patch is here:
> > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/attachment.cgi?id=2014&action=view
>
> If you have another developer to support this patch I am OK with it. :-)
ok, i will write Tommasso to ask him if he wants to to finish it
On Friday 23 May 2008 11:40:03 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> old patch is here:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/attachment.cgi?id=2014&action=view
If you have another developer to support this patch I am OK with it. :-)
What needs to be done to finish the patch?
The next question is, if everything goes wrong w
José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 23 May 2008 11:17:28 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >
> > is search dialog major feature?
>
> Are the code changes restrict to a single place (or a small set of places)?
old patch is here:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/attachment.cgi?id=2014&action=view
pavel
On Friday 23 May 2008 11:24:37 José Matos wrote:
> Nope. This is very invasive and I look that this change would occur at the
> begin of a development cycle.
s/I look this change would occur/I would like this change to occur/
--
José Abílio
José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 23 May 2008 11:15:57 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > So from now on no major features are allowed.
> >
> > No xml file format?
>
> Nope. This is very invasive
are you sure? :))
pavel
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
