On 08/11/2018 04:42, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:53:16PM -1000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Indeed, it seems to me that adding the subscript automatically is a bit too
much. Not everybody wants it, after all. For some reason it doesn't work like
overset. I am not sure th
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:53:16PM -1000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Indeed, it seems to me that adding the subscript automatically is a bit too
> much. Not everybody wants it, after all. For some reason it doesn't work like
> overset. I am not sure that we should hide these differences in Ly
Le 7 novembre 2018 16:23:41 GMT-10:00, Scott Kostyshak a
écrit :
>Nice. I don't know if the following is a good idea, but why not put the
>cursor into the inset of the underbrace automatically?
>
>For example, if I select "x" and then click on "underbrace", I have to
>press "_" to be able to writ
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:55:42PM -1000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 06/11/2018 à 23:34, Daniel a écrit :
> > Haven't followed the thread, but does this solve
> >
> > https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10077
> >
> > ?
>
> It looks like it does.
Nice. I don't know if the following is a good i
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:13:41PM -1000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 06/11/2018 à 07:37, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 07:23:19AM -1000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > Le 06/11/2018 à 07:19, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > > Tested and it works well! I tested a few
Le 06/11/2018 à 23:34, Daniel a écrit :
Haven't followed the thread, but does this solve
https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10077
?
It looks like it does.
JMarc
On 30/10/2018 17:39, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 06:36:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 31/03/2018 à 19:49, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
To see an issue that has long annoyed me, do the following:
1. In math mode, type "=".
2. Select the "=" you just typed.
3. Choose
Le 06/11/2018 à 07:37, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 07:23:19AM -1000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 06/11/2018 à 07:19, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Tested and it works well! I tested a few different "Frame decorations".
I also tested writing "x" in math mode, selecting it an
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 07:23:19AM -1000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 06/11/2018 à 07:19, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > Tested and it works well! I tested a few different "Frame decorations".
> > I also tested writing "x" in math mode, selecting it and then writing
> > "\cases". Now the cursor
Le 06/11/2018 à 07:19, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Tested and it works well! I tested a few different "Frame decorations".
I also tested writing "x" in math mode, selecting it and then writing
"\cases". Now the cursor is put in the second box of cases, and I think
that is nice. I like it!
I've go
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 09:59:04PM -1000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 05/11/2018 à 05:43, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > Please try the attached and tell me if you like it.
> >
> > For me it doesn't make much of a difference for the use case I
> > mentioned. I now get the attached screenshot
Le 05/11/2018 à 05:43, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Please try the attached and tell me if you like it.
For me it doesn't make much of a difference for the use case I
mentioned. I now get the attached screenshot with those steps. Either
with this patch or without this patch, I need to click (or mo
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 09:32:49PM -1000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 04/11/2018 à 11:16, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > I see, sounds tricky. Perhaps we should leave things untouched? Would it
> > be complicated to allow for the multi-cell inset to decide what the
> > behavior is? I'm guessing
Le 04/11/2018 à 11:16, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I see, sounds tricky. Perhaps we should leave things untouched? Would it
be complicated to allow for the multi-cell inset to decide what the
behavior is? I'm guessing this would be too complicated and is not the
best use of your time, but in case I
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 08:42:42AM -1000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 04/11/2018 à 18:38, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > OK, so you would like to put the selection contents to the first cell, but
> > > the cursor in the next one. Is that right?
> >
> > Yes, that is the most natural to me as
Le 04/11/2018 à 18:38, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
OK, so you would like to put the selection contents to the first cell, but
the cursor in the next one. Is that right?
Yes, that is the most natural to me as a user. From the technical
perspective (in the way you describe), it does appear unintuit
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 08:07:51AM -1000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 04/11/2018 à 17:58, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > If I do the following steps:
> >
> > 1. In math mode, type "=".
> > 2. Select the "=" you just typed.
> > 3. Choose "Overset" from the math toolbar (alternatively, just type
Le 04/11/2018 à 17:58, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
If I do the following steps:
1. In math mode, type "=".
2. Select the "=" you just typed.
3. Choose "Overset" from the math toolbar (alternatively, just type "\overset").
4. Type "def".
OK, so you would like to put the selection contents to the
Le 30/10/2018 à 16:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
The issue is now fixed in master. I have another feature request: I
think the cursor should be put in the newly created box (just like with
superscript, for example). Should I make a trac ticket for this
enhancement?
I am not sure of what you mea
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 06:36:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 31/03/2018 à 19:49, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > To see an issue that has long annoyed me, do the following:
> >
> > 1. In math mode, type "=".
> > 2. Select the "=" you just typed.
> > 3. Choose "Overset" from the math to
Am Montag, 9. April 2018 17:38:37 CEST schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
:
> Le 09/04/2018 à 17:10, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > Instead of searching for the biggest char in an inset, we could always use
> > 'f'. Am I missing something?
>
> I am not really searching for the biigest char. The fact is, th
Le 09/04/2018 à 17:10, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Instead of searching for the biggest char in an inset, we could always use
'f'. Am I missing something?
I am not really searching for the biigest char. The fact is, that for
example $\sqrt{a}$ does not have the same height as $\sqrt{f}$. I do not
Am Montag, 9. April 2018 16:39:19 CEST schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
:
> Le 09/04/2018 à 16:17, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> > The current master situation seems indeed the best from all the patches
> > I've been testing so far.
>
> But shouldn't $a$ have the same cursor as $f$?
>
> JMarc
Instead of
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 09/04/2018 ?? 16:17, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> The current master situation seems indeed the best from all the patches
>> I've
>> been testing so far.
>
> But shouldn't $a$ have the same cursor as $f$?
I do not see why cursor must have the same height for all of th
Le 09/04/2018 à 16:17, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
The current master situation seems indeed the best from all the patches I've
been testing so far.
But shouldn't $a$ have the same cursor as $f$?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 07/04/2018 ?? 12:18, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
>> They seem to be fine, but time will tell. I am rather concerned with the
>> cursor height in mathed. Seemingly, it is proportional to the height of the
>> tallest character in a cell, so that the cursor almost disa
Le 07/04/2018 à 12:18, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
They seem to be fine, but time will tell. I am rather concerned with the
cursor height in mathed. Seemingly, it is proportional to the height of
the tallest character in a cell, so that the cursor almost disappears when
only a minus sign is prese
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> They seem to be fine, but time will tell. I am rather concerned with the
> cursor height in mathed. Seemingly, it is proportional to the height of
> the tallest character in a cell, so that the cursor almost disappears when
> only a minus sign is present. This is very ugl
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:27:17AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Enrico, I would appreciate if you could take a quick look at the changes in
> Cursor.cpp. I change the defaults for some important macros, and I do not
> want to break something unrelated to what I was trying to change.
The
Le 05/04/2018 à 04:51, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 04:36:26PM +, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Comments welcome.
Tested and works well! I actually wasn't very hopeful that someone would
make a patch when I posted this issue. I am glad to be surprised.
Thank you for yo
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 04:36:26PM +, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Comments welcome.
Tested and works well! I actually wasn't very hopeful that someone would
make a patch when I posted this issue. I am glad to be surprised.
Thank you for your work on it,
Scott
signature.asc
Description:
Le 31/03/2018 à 19:49, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
To see an issue that has long annoyed me, do the following:
1. In math mode, type "=".
2. Select the "=" you just typed.
3. Choose "Overset" from the math toolbar (alternatively, just type "\overset").
The "=" is put in the "above" box, because t
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> To see an issue that has long annoyed me, do the following:
>
> 1. In math mode, type "=".
> 2. Select the "=" you just typed.
> 3. Choose "Overset" from the math toolbar (alternatively, just type
> "\overset").
>
> The "=" is put in the
To see an issue that has long annoyed me, do the following:
1. In math mode, type "=".
2. Select the "=" you just typed.
3. Choose "Overset" from the math toolbar (alternatively, just type "\overset").
The "=" is put in the "above" box, because that is the first LaTeX
argument. From the user pers
34 matches
Mail list logo
