Re: Backtrace from Mystery Crash

2014-06-23 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 23.06.2014 um 16:22 schrieb jken...@ssc.wisc.edu: > The binary with the symbols is actually a little smaller (112.2MB vs. > 114.2). Does this make sense? Yes, it's made on a 10.6.8 Mac for i386 CPU. The sizes are: * LyX-2.1.0+qt4-cocoa.dmg 108,87 MB * LyX-2.1.0+qt4-i386-cocoa.dmg 106,71 MB *

Re: Backtrace from Mystery Crash

2014-06-23 Thread jkennan
The binary with the symbols is actually a little smaller (112.2MB vs. 114.2). Does this make sense? John > > Just thinking - the sizes of the binaries with and without symbols > seem > to be the same. Wouldn't it be an option to always build as an > unstripped binary, so that backtraces could eas

Re: Backtrace from Mystery Crash

2014-06-23 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 23.06.2014 um 15:30 schrieb Rainer M Krug : > Just thinking - the sizes of the binaries with and without symbols seem > to be the same. Wouldn't it be an option to always build as an > unstripped binary, so that backtraces could easily be created, and > possibly even automatically (after approv

Re: Backtrace from Mystery Crash

2014-06-23 Thread Rainer M Krug
Just thinking - the sizes of the binaries with and without symbols seem to be the same. Wouldn't it be an option to always build as an unstripped binary, so that backtraces could easily be created, and possibly even automatically (after approval by the user, obviously) be mailed after a crash? Ra

Re: Backtrace from Mystery Crash

2014-06-23 Thread Stephan Witt
Hi John, I've put the package with the unstripped LyX binary here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0-unstripped%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg.sig https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.1.0-unstripped%2Bqt4-cocoa.dmg It's made from the same tarball as the official 2.1.0 LyX I'v

Re: Backtrace from Mystery Crash

2014-06-22 Thread jkennan
Pavel: Yes, I'm happy to cooperate on this in any way I can (I use LyX every day, and I owe you guys big). But this crash is rare, so it might be a while before it happens again. John > John Kennan wrote: >> Yes, please attach your crash report here, if possible. >> >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ti

Re: Backtrace from Mystery Crash

2014-06-22 Thread Pavel Sanda
John Kennan wrote: > Yes, please attach your crash report here, if possible. > > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9049 > > If you don't have an account and don't want to create one > you can sent it to the list, of course. We need backtrace with debug symbol on, this is not much helpful. John, if

Re: Backtrace from Mystery Crash

2014-06-21 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 21.06.2014 um 15:01 schrieb John Kennan : > Richard Heck lyx.org> writes: > >> > > So, is it this? > > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9049 Probably. Did the file end with \begin_inset Tabular? >>> Yes, indeed. >> >> Same crash, then. >> OSX didn't generate

Re: Backtrace from Mystery Crash

2014-06-21 Thread John Kennan
Richard Heck lyx.org> writes: > > >>> > >>> So, is it this? > >>> > >>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9049 > >> > >> Probably. Did the file end with \begin_inset Tabular? > > Yes, indeed. > > Same crash, then. > > >> OSX didn't generate a crash report, did it? > > Yes, it did--here it is: >

Backtrace from Mystery Crash

2014-06-17 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/17/2014 10:58 AM, Maria Gouskova wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Richard Heck wrote: On 06/16/2014 04:29 PM, Maria Gouskova wrote: Hi all, So LyX (2.1.0, Mac OS 10.6) stopped responding after I did something fairly routine to a file (adding references), and I forced the program