Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-31 Thread José Matos
On Sun, 2022-07-31 at 13:52 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Thanks for the offer José, but I took a different way, which does not > change the  syntax. I have not documented it yet though. > > JMarc That is nice to know. :-) -- José Abílio -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.or

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-31 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Thanks for the offer José, but I took a different way, which does not change the syntax. I have not documented it yet though. JMarc Le 31 juillet 2022 12:50:34 GMT+02:00, "José Matos" a écrit : >I can do the python part if you want to. :-) > -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.or

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-31 Thread José Matos
On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 10:10 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > However, I am not sure how to implement the prefs2prefs part, firstly > because one have to handle quotes (or absence thereof) and spaces and > secondly because I am bad at python. > > So do we want to do this for 2.4? I can do all t

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-27 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Wed, 27 Jul 2022 19:02:42 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 27/07/2022 à 12:37, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >> I could not resist. Try this one, please. > > > > That is what I suspected/hoped :) > > The result is perfect! > > please commit. > > Done. > > You are devilish. Thanks, y

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 27/07/2022 à 12:37, Kornel Benko a écrit : I could not resist. Try this one, please. That is what I suspected/hoped :) The result is perfect! please commit. Done. You are devilish. It is not nice to profit from others' weaknesses ;) Anyway, my summer coding spree stops tomorrow, so this

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-27 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:01:18 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 25/07/2022 à 12:59, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >> We could stay with the current patch. It is good enough for what you > >> want to do, isn't it? > > > > Yes, it is. > > I could not resist. Try this one, please. That is wh

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 25/07/2022 à 12:59, Kornel Benko a écrit : We could stay with the current patch. It is good enough for what you want to do, isn't it? Yes, it is. I could not resist. Try this one, please. JMarc From f0d8efec3ec11a3a1d8ab61b864720122f7f1c17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jean-Marc Lasgout

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-25 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mon, 25 Jul 2022 12:11:23 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 25/07/2022 à 10:39, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > Am Sun, 24 Jul 2022 22:57:01 +0200 > > schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > > >> Le 24/07/2022 à 19:52, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >>> /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/KeyMap.cpp: In mem

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 25/07/2022 à 10:39, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Sun, 24 Jul 2022 22:57:01 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : Le 24/07/2022 à 19:52, Kornel Benko a écrit : /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/KeyMap.cpp: In member function ‘lyx::KeyMap::ReturnValues lyx::KeyMap::readWithoutConv(const lyx::support::Fi

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-25 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 24 Jul 2022 22:57:01 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 24/07/2022 à 19:52, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/KeyMap.cpp: In member function > > ‘lyx::KeyMap::ReturnValues > > lyx::KeyMap::readWithoutConv(const lyx::support::FileName&, > > lyx::KeyMap*)’: /usr2/s

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-24 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 24/07/2022 à 19:52, Kornel Benko a écrit : /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/KeyMap.cpp: In member function ‘lyx::KeyMap::ReturnValues lyx::KeyMap::readWithoutConv(const lyx::support::FileName&, lyx::KeyMap*)’: /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/KeyMap.cpp:337:16: error: ‘FunRequest’ has not been declared if

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-24 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 24 Jul 2022 19:36:43 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > Le 24/07/2022 à 19:35, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > > Le 24/07/2022 à 13:00, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >> Use this in user.bind > >> \unbind "Tab" "message *" > >> (for the proposed '\unbind "Tab" "*"' is more to do) > >

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-24 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 24/07/2022 à 19:35, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 24/07/2022 à 13:00, Kornel Benko a écrit : Use this in user.bind \unbind "Tab" "message *" (for the proposed '\unbind "Tab" "*"' is more to do) This seems to work. But the shortcut-dialog still shows the original setting. With this

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-24 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 24/07/2022 à 13:00, Kornel Benko a écrit : Use this in user.bind \unbind "Tab" "message *" (for the proposed '\unbind "Tab" "*"' is more to do) This seems to work. But the shortcut-dialog still shows the original setting. With this patch, your can unbind "*" directly. This seems cle

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-24 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:35:46 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:20:59 +0200 > schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > > Le 19/07/2022 à 11:11, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > > The only drawback I see is when there are more than one binding to a key. > > > > > > > Ahh. Good point. >

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-19 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:20:59 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 19/07/2022 à 11:11, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > The only drawback I see is when there are more than one binding to a key. > > Ahh. Good point. > > Then we can add special handling for function "*", which means all > binding

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 19/07/2022 à 11:11, Kornel Benko a écrit : The only drawback I see is when there are more than one binding to a key. Ahh. Good point. Then we can add special handling for function "*", which means all bindings to this sequence. JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org htt

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-19 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:43:41 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 19/07/2022 à 10:36, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > Why not simply ignore the second part, so that > > \unbind "xyzzy" "some (non) emty string" > > would still work. > > Yes, I thought about that. It is not really clean, thou

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 19/07/2022 à 10:36, Kornel Benko a écrit : Why not simply ignore the second part, so that \unbind "xyzzy" "some (non) emty string" would still work. Yes, I thought about that. It is not really clean, though :) I can do it right now, but I would not want this to stay like that. JMa

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-19 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:10:04 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 18/07/2022 à 14:44, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >history. I think it is a design error. Looks good (if used manually). I > >never unbound > >a key in tests. Have to prepare the > > scripts. > > Also I have to know the binding, li

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 18/07/2022 à 14:44, Kornel Benko a écrit : history. I think it is a design error. Looks good (if used manually). I never unbound a key in tests. Have to prepare the scripts. Also I have to know the binding, like \unbind "Tab""command-alternatives completion-accept;cell-forward;tab-ins

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-18 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:44:27 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:56:15 +0200 > schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > > Le 18/07/2022 à 12:43, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > > And makes some findadv tests fail. What is the key-combination now to > > > switch the > > > focus? Or is th

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-18 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:56:15 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 18/07/2022 à 12:43, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > And makes some findadv tests fail. What is the key-combination now to > > switch the > > focus? Or is there a lyx-command to do it? > > I guess you run the tests with controlle

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 18/07/2022 à 12:43, Kornel Benko a écrit : And makes some findadv tests fail. What is the key-combination now to switch the focus? Or is there a lyx-command to do it? I guess you run the tests with controlled preferences. This means that you can unbind Tab and BackTab. Would that work?

Re: [LyX/master] Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful

2022-07-18 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mon, 18 Jul 2022 11:30:02 +0200 (CEST) schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > commit 2b24c03e8b83e6397c5cbf7dcd69f77fb4e67e62 > Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Date: Mon Jul 18 12:02:28 2022 +0200 > > Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful > >

Re: Back

2022-05-21 Thread Daniel
with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my role as release manager for that project, if that's still required. Riki Hi Riki, Nice to hear that you are back! I am not sure whether you already checked the "LyX 2.4.0" threat. But there are a couple of patches (incl

Re: Back

2022-05-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 03/05/2022 à 23:05, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : I've been using Version 2.4.0-alpha3 (Sunday, 14 February 2021) Qt Version (run-time): 5.15.2 Qt Version (compile-time): 5.15.2 Python detected: python -tt that Riki produced earlier in the year on windows 10 for all my work without problems beyo

Re: Back

2022-05-04 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Mittwoch, dem 04.05.2022 um 11:52 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > > There's one (big) question for 2.4: should we include Jürgen's > > latest changes for indices? I'm still working on the XHTML part, > > with a quite large refactoring at the same time to make the code > > (much) easier to

Re: Back

2022-05-04 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Wednesday, 4 May 2022 16.52.32 WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > FWIW, I've been using the master branch for daily work for some time and have > not run into any new major issues. A few small things with line breaking, but > they're hard to reproduce. I think one invovled a quotation mark th

Re: Back

2022-05-04 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 5/4/22 07:47, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from everything else until things settled down

Re: Back

2022-05-04 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
else until things settled down. Which they now have. Welcome back :)! Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my role as release manager for that project, if that's still required. There's one (big) question for 2.4: should we include Jürgen&#x

Re: Back

2022-05-04 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal > circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from > everything else until things settled down. Which they now have. I'm happy

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
am glad to see you back ! Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my role as release manager for that project, if that's still required. That would be great. Preparing a quick 2.4.0 prerelease would be an excellent way to see what is ready and what is not, indee

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 4/05/2022 7:55 am, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Hi, all, Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from everything else until

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Hi, all, > > Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal > circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from > everything else until things settled down. Which they now ha

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Kornel Benko
ester and just had to withdraw > > from everything else until things settled down. Which they now have. > > > > Welcome back :)! > > > > Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my role > > as release manager for that project, if that&#

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Kornel Benko
and an incredibly busy semester and just had to > > withdraw > > from everything else until things settled down. Which they now have. > > > > Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my > > role > > as release manager for that proje

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
s settled down. Which they now have. > > Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my > role > as release manager for that project, if that's still required. > > Riki Welcome back, Riki! Good to see you are well. Many of us (incl. me) hav

Re: Back

2022-05-03 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
h they now have. > Welcome back :)! > Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my role > as release manager for that project, if that's still required. > There's one (big) question for 2.4: should we include Jürgen's latest changes for indices? I&

Back

2022-05-03 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
Hi, all, Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from everything else until things settled down. Which they now have. Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my role

Back

2022-05-03 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
Hi, all, Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from everything else until things settled down. Which they now have. Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my role

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #2203

2022-04-03 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2203/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #2147

2022-02-20 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2147/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #2429

2022-02-09 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2429/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #2112

2022-01-13 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2112/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2274

2021-12-08 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2274/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #2369

2020-12-07 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2369/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #2073

2020-12-06 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2073/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2272

2020-12-06 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2272/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #2367

2020-12-06 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2367/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Fwd: [LyX/2.3.x] Back to development

2020-11-30 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
2.3.x is open again under the usual rules. Forwarded Message Subject:[LyX/2.3.x] Back to development Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:01:57 +0100 (CET) From: Richard Kimberly Heck Reply-To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org To: lyx-...@lists.lyx.org commit

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #2355

2020-11-30 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2355/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #2058

2020-11-29 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2058/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2259

2020-11-29 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2259/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2257

2020-11-28 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2257/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2241

2020-11-20 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2241/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #2320

2020-11-14 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2320/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #2279

2020-10-22 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2279/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2107

2020-09-04 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2107/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #1898

2020-09-04 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1898/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2088

2020-08-26 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2088/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #1849

2020-08-13 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1849/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2058

2020-08-13 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2058/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2047

2020-08-07 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2047/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2041

2020-08-04 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2041/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2039

2020-08-03 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2039/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #1818

2020-07-31 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1818/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2019

2020-07-25 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2019/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #2104

2020-07-25 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2104/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #1810

2020-07-25 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1810/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #1785

2020-07-09 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1785/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #1993

2020-07-09 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1993/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #1782

2020-07-08 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1782/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #1673

2020-05-01 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1673/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #1855

2020-04-10 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1855/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #1826

2020-02-15 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1826/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #1835

2019-11-28 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/1835/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #1674

2019-08-07 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1674/

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #1751

2019-08-07 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/1751/

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #1457

2019-08-07 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1457/

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #1737

2019-07-13 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/1737/

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #1443

2019-07-12 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1443/

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #1661

2019-07-12 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1661/

Re: Scale back support for XeTeX with TeX fonts?

2019-07-12 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag, 12. Juli 2019, 19:44:49 CEST schrieb Guenter Milde: > On 2019-07-12, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > > > Am Freitag, 12. Juli 2019, 10:57:59 CEST schrieb Guenter Milde: > >> On 2019-07-09, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> > Dear LyX developers

Re: Scale back support for XeTeX with TeX fonts?

2019-07-12 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2019-07-12, Kornel Benko wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > Am Freitag, 12. Juli 2019, 10:57:59 CEST schrieb Guenter Milde: >> On 2019-07-09, Guenter Milde wrote: >> > Dear LyX developers, > I simplified the regexes a little. The resulting tests are same. Thank y

Re: Scale back support for XeTeX with TeX fonts?

2019-07-12 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2019-07-12, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 10:57 + schrieb Guenter Milde: >> >Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8. >> Done in 130c7440696b. > I figure this needs a word or two in the releas

Re: Scale back support for XeTeX with TeX fonts?

2019-07-12 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 10:57 + schrieb Guenter Milde: > >Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8. > > Done in 130c7440696b. I figure this needs a word or two in the release notes. Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Scale back support for XeTeX with TeX fonts?

2019-07-12 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag, 12. Juli 2019, 10:57:59 CEST schrieb Guenter Milde: > On 2019-07-09, Guenter Milde wrote: > > Dear LyX developers, > > > recent discussion about failing tests with the linguistics.module led to the > > suggestion: > > > Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8. > > Done i

Re: Scale back support for XeTeX with TeX fonts?

2019-07-12 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2019-07-09, Guenter Milde wrote: > Dear LyX developers, > recent discussion about failing tests with the linguistics.module led to the > suggestion: > Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8. Done in 130c7440696b. Günter

Re: Scale back support for XeTeX with TeX fonts?

2019-07-09 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2019-07-09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 09/07/2019 à 13:32, Guenter Milde a écrit : >> Dear LyX developers, >> recent discussion about failing tests with the linguistics.module led to the >> suggestion: >>Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8. > I do not have much knowle

Re: Scale back support for XeTeX with TeX fonts?

2019-07-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 09/07/2019 à 13:32, Guenter Milde a écrit : Dear LyX developers, recent discussion about failing tests with the linguistics.module led to the suggestion: Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8. I do not have much knowledge on this. What is the way forward that we offer for

Scale back support for XeTeX with TeX fonts?

2019-07-09 Thread Guenter Milde
Dear LyX developers, recent discussion about failing tests with the linguistics.module led to the suggestion: Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8. Pro *There is no known case where this combination is required or helpfull.* LyX follows LaTeX in ceasing to officially supp

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #1417

2019-06-21 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1417/

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #1632

2019-06-20 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1632/

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #1583

2019-05-20 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1583/

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #1659

2019-05-20 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/1659/

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #1372

2019-05-20 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1372/

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #1579

2019-05-16 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1579/

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #1554

2019-04-30 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1554/

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #1506

2019-03-30 Thread ci-lyx
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1506/

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >