On Sun, 2022-07-31 at 13:52 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Thanks for the offer José, but I took a different way, which does not
> change the syntax. I have not documented it yet though.
>
> JMarc
That is nice to know. :-)
--
José Abílio
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.or
Thanks for the offer José, but I took a different way, which does not change
the syntax. I have not documented it yet though.
JMarc
Le 31 juillet 2022 12:50:34 GMT+02:00, "José Matos" a
écrit :
>I can do the python part if you want to. :-)
>
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.or
On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 10:10 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> However, I am not sure how to implement the prefs2prefs part, firstly
> because one have to handle quotes (or absence thereof) and spaces and
> secondly because I am bad at python.
>
> So do we want to do this for 2.4? I can do all t
Am Wed, 27 Jul 2022 19:02:42 +0200
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 27/07/2022 à 12:37, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >> I could not resist. Try this one, please.
> >
> > That is what I suspected/hoped :)
> > The result is perfect!
> > please commit.
>
> Done.
>
> You are devilish.
Thanks, y
Le 27/07/2022 à 12:37, Kornel Benko a écrit :
I could not resist. Try this one, please.
That is what I suspected/hoped :)
The result is perfect!
please commit.
Done.
You are devilish. It is not nice to profit from others' weaknesses ;)
Anyway, my summer coding spree stops tomorrow, so this
Am Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:01:18 +0200
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 25/07/2022 à 12:59, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >> We could stay with the current patch. It is good enough for what you
> >> want to do, isn't it?
> >
> > Yes, it is.
>
> I could not resist. Try this one, please.
That is wh
Le 25/07/2022 à 12:59, Kornel Benko a écrit :
We could stay with the current patch. It is good enough for what you
want to do, isn't it?
Yes, it is.
I could not resist. Try this one, please.
JMarc
From f0d8efec3ec11a3a1d8ab61b864720122f7f1c17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean-Marc Lasgout
Am Mon, 25 Jul 2022 12:11:23 +0200
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 25/07/2022 à 10:39, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > Am Sun, 24 Jul 2022 22:57:01 +0200
> > schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> >
> >> Le 24/07/2022 à 19:52, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >>> /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/KeyMap.cpp: In mem
Le 25/07/2022 à 10:39, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Am Sun, 24 Jul 2022 22:57:01 +0200
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
Le 24/07/2022 à 19:52, Kornel Benko a écrit :
/usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/KeyMap.cpp: In member function
‘lyx::KeyMap::ReturnValues
lyx::KeyMap::readWithoutConv(const lyx::support::Fi
Am Sun, 24 Jul 2022 22:57:01 +0200
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 24/07/2022 à 19:52, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/KeyMap.cpp: In member function
> > ‘lyx::KeyMap::ReturnValues
> > lyx::KeyMap::readWithoutConv(const lyx::support::FileName&,
> > lyx::KeyMap*)’: /usr2/s
Le 24/07/2022 à 19:52, Kornel Benko a écrit :
/usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/KeyMap.cpp: In member function
‘lyx::KeyMap::ReturnValues
lyx::KeyMap::readWithoutConv(const lyx::support::FileName&,
lyx::KeyMap*)’: /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/KeyMap.cpp:337:16: error:
‘FunRequest’ has not
been declared if
Am Sun, 24 Jul 2022 19:36:43 +0200
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> Le 24/07/2022 à 19:35, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> > Le 24/07/2022 à 13:00, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >> Use this in user.bind
> >> \unbind "Tab" "message *"
> >> (for the proposed '\unbind "Tab" "*"' is more to do)
> >
Le 24/07/2022 à 19:35, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 24/07/2022 à 13:00, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Use this in user.bind
\unbind "Tab" "message *"
(for the proposed '\unbind "Tab" "*"' is more to do)
This seems to work. But the shortcut-dialog still shows the original
setting.
With this
Le 24/07/2022 à 13:00, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Use this in user.bind
\unbind "Tab" "message *"
(for the proposed '\unbind "Tab" "*"' is more to do)
This seems to work. But the shortcut-dialog still shows the original
setting.
With this patch, your can unbind "*" directly. This seems cle
Am Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:35:46 +0200
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:20:59 +0200
> schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> > Le 19/07/2022 à 11:11, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > > The only drawback I see is when there are more than one binding to a key.
> > >
> >
> > Ahh. Good point.
>
Am Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:20:59 +0200
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 19/07/2022 à 11:11, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > The only drawback I see is when there are more than one binding to a key.
>
> Ahh. Good point.
>
> Then we can add special handling for function "*", which means all
> binding
Le 19/07/2022 à 11:11, Kornel Benko a écrit :
The only drawback I see is when there are more than one binding to a key.
Ahh. Good point.
Then we can add special handling for function "*", which means all
bindings to this sequence.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
htt
Am Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:43:41 +0200
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 19/07/2022 à 10:36, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > Why not simply ignore the second part, so that
> > \unbind "xyzzy" "some (non) emty string"
> > would still work.
>
> Yes, I thought about that. It is not really clean, thou
Le 19/07/2022 à 10:36, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Why not simply ignore the second part, so that
\unbind "xyzzy" "some (non) emty string"
would still work.
Yes, I thought about that. It is not really clean, though :)
I can do it right now, but I would not want this to stay like that.
JMa
Am Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:10:04 +0200
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 18/07/2022 à 14:44, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >history. I think it is a design error. Looks good (if used manually). I
> >never unbound
> >a key in tests. Have to prepare the
> > scripts.
> > Also I have to know the binding, li
Le 18/07/2022 à 14:44, Kornel Benko a écrit :
history. I think it is a design error. Looks good (if used manually). I never
unbound a key in tests. Have to prepare the
scripts.
Also I have to know the binding, like
\unbind "Tab""command-alternatives
completion-accept;cell-forward;tab-ins
Am Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:44:27 +0200
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:56:15 +0200
> schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> > Le 18/07/2022 à 12:43, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > > And makes some findadv tests fail. What is the key-combination now to
> > > switch the
> > > focus? Or is th
Am Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:56:15 +0200
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 18/07/2022 à 12:43, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > And makes some findadv tests fail. What is the key-combination now to
> > switch the
> > focus? Or is there a lyx-command to do it?
>
> I guess you run the tests with controlle
Le 18/07/2022 à 12:43, Kornel Benko a écrit :
And makes some findadv tests fail. What is the key-combination now to switch
the focus?
Or is there a lyx-command to do it?
I guess you run the tests with controlled preferences. This means that
you can unbind Tab and BackTab.
Would that work?
Am Mon, 18 Jul 2022 11:30:02 +0200 (CEST)
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> commit 2b24c03e8b83e6397c5cbf7dcd69f77fb4e67e62
> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Date: Mon Jul 18 12:02:28 2022 +0200
>
> Do not override (Back)Tab in Adv F&R when it is useful
>
>
with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my role
as release manager for that project, if that's still required.
Riki
Hi Riki,
Nice to hear that you are back! I am not sure whether you already
checked the "LyX 2.4.0" threat. But there are a couple of patches
(incl
Le 03/05/2022 à 23:05, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
I've been using
Version 2.4.0-alpha3 (Sunday, 14 February 2021)
Qt Version (run-time): 5.15.2
Qt Version (compile-time): 5.15.2
Python detected: python -tt
that Riki produced earlier in the year on windows 10 for all my work
without problems beyo
Am Mittwoch, dem 04.05.2022 um 11:52 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> > There's one (big) question for 2.4: should we include Jürgen's
> > latest changes for indices? I'm still working on the XHTML part,
> > with a quite large refactoring at the same time to make the code
> > (much) easier to
On Wednesday, 4 May 2022 16.52.32 WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> FWIW, I've been using the master branch for daily work for some time and
have
> not run into any new major issues. A few small things with line breaking,
but
> they're hard to reproduce. I think one invovled a quotation mark th
On 5/4/22 07:47, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal
circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from
everything else until things settled down
else until things settled down. Which they now have.
Welcome back :)!
Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my
role
as release manager for that project, if that's still required.
There's one (big) question for 2.4: should we include Jürgen
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal
> circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from
> everything else until things settled down. Which they now have.
I'm happy
am glad to see you back !
Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my role
as release manager for that project, if that's still required.
That would be great. Preparing a quick 2.4.0 prerelease would be an
excellent way to see what is ready and what is not, indee
On 4/05/2022 7:55 am, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Hi, all,
Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal
circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from
everything else until
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:19:16AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal
> circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw from
> everything else until things settled down. Which they now ha
ester and just had to withdraw
> > from everything else until things settled down. Which they now have.
> >
>
> Welcome back :)!
>
>
> > Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my role
> > as release manager for that project, if that
and an incredibly busy semester and just had to
> > withdraw
> > from everything else until things settled down. Which they now have.
> >
> > Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my
> > role
> > as release manager for that proje
s settled down. Which they now have.
>
> Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my
> role
> as release manager for that project, if that's still required.
>
> Riki
Welcome back, Riki! Good to see you are well. Many of us (incl. me)
hav
h they now have.
>
Welcome back :)!
> Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my role
> as release manager for that project, if that's still required.
>
There's one (big) question for 2.4: should we include Jürgen's latest
changes for indices? I&
Hi, all,
Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal
circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw
from everything else until things settled down. Which they now have.
Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my role
Hi, all,
Sorry for disappearing there for a while. I had some difficult personal
circumstances and an incredibly busy semester and just had to withdraw
from everything else until things settled down. Which they now have.
Where are things with respect to LyX 2.4.0? I'm happy to resume my role
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2203/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2147/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2429/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2112/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2274/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2369/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2073/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2272/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2367/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
2.3.x is open again under the usual rules.
Forwarded Message
Subject:[LyX/2.3.x] Back to development
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:01:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Richard Kimberly Heck
Reply-To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
To: lyx-...@lists.lyx.org
commit
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2355/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2058/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2259/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2257/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2241/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2320/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2279/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2107/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1898/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2088/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1849/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2058/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2047/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2041/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2039/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1818/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2019/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2104/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1810/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1785/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1993/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1782/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1673/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1855/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1826/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/1835/
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1674/
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/1751/
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1457/
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/1737/
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1443/
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1661/
Am Freitag, 12. Juli 2019, 19:44:49 CEST schrieb Guenter Milde:
> On 2019-07-12, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
>
> > Am Freitag, 12. Juli 2019, 10:57:59 CEST schrieb Guenter Milde:
> >> On 2019-07-09, Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> > Dear LyX developers
On 2019-07-12, Kornel Benko wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> Am Freitag, 12. Juli 2019, 10:57:59 CEST schrieb Guenter Milde:
>> On 2019-07-09, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> > Dear LyX developers,
> I simplified the regexes a little. The resulting tests are same.
Thank y
On 2019-07-12, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 10:57 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
>> >Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8.
>> Done in 130c7440696b.
> I figure this needs a word or two in the releas
Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 10:57 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
> >Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8.
>
> Done in 130c7440696b.
I figure this needs a word or two in the release notes.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Freitag, 12. Juli 2019, 10:57:59 CEST schrieb Guenter Milde:
> On 2019-07-09, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > Dear LyX developers,
>
> > recent discussion about failing tests with the linguistics.module led to the
> > suggestion:
>
> > Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8.
>
> Done i
On 2019-07-09, Guenter Milde wrote:
> Dear LyX developers,
> recent discussion about failing tests with the linguistics.module led to the
> suggestion:
> Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8.
Done in 130c7440696b.
Günter
On 2019-07-09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 09/07/2019 à 13:32, Guenter Milde a écrit :
>> Dear LyX developers,
>> recent discussion about failing tests with the linguistics.module led to the
>> suggestion:
>>Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8.
> I do not have much knowle
Le 09/07/2019 à 13:32, Guenter Milde a écrit :
Dear LyX developers,
recent discussion about failing tests with the linguistics.module led to the
suggestion:
Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8.
I do not have much knowledge on this.
What is the way forward that we offer for
Dear LyX developers,
recent discussion about failing tests with the linguistics.module led to the
suggestion:
Drop support for XeTeX + TeX fonts + inputenc utf8.
Pro
*There is no known case where this combination is required or helpfull.*
LyX follows LaTeX in ceasing to officially supp
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1417/
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1632/
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1583/
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/1659/
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/1372/
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1579/
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1554/
https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/1506/
1 - 100 of 592 matches
Mail list logo