On Sat, 2022-12-10 at 19:03 +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> apt build-dep lyx
>
> Pavel
For those of you using Fedora (and related distributions) the
equivalent is surprisingly:
$ dnf build-dep lyx
...
Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:19 ago on Sat 10 Dec 2022 08:19:31
PM WET.
Package make-1:4.3
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:16:16AM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> apt build-dep lyx
> Reading package lists... Done
> E: You must put some 'deb-src' URIs in your sources.list
>
>
> I wasn't sure if that meant this fell out of maintenance or was a
> legitimate error. If legitimate, do we know how t
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:04 AM Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 10:40:37AM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> > If you (or someone) can help me provision the build environment to the
> > point where I can build/package, I'd then be able to show potential
> benefit
>
> apt build-dep lyx
>
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 10:40:37AM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> If you (or someone) can help me provision the build environment to the
> point where I can build/package, I'd then be able to show potential benefit
apt build-dep lyx
Pavel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://li
On Sat, 2022-12-10 at 10:40 -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> Thanks for these thoughts. I tried to follow the ReleaseProcedure as
> a test with an Ubuntu docker image (a minimal Ubuntu
> "installation"). Almost everything needs to be installed, which begs
> the question: what are the prer
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 2:20 AM Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 02:42:52PM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 2:16 PM Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Le 26/11/2022 ?? 21:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > > 5. We should produce snapshot binaries (i.e
Am Mo., 28. Nov. 2022 um 10:19 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>
> Where it would be perhaps more useful is Windows/Mac platforms,
> but esp. in Win world we are nowhere close to an automatic builds
> (am I correct Eugene?)
>
I think it might be possible, running the compiler from the command line in
w
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 02:42:52PM -0700, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 2:16 PM Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> wrote:
>
> > Le 26/11/2022 ?? 21:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > 5. We should produce snapshot binaries (i.e., testing releases that
> > > aren't necessarily at a stage w
On 11/26/22 16:33, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 03:55:38PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 11/26/22 15:17, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
5. We should produce snapshot binaries (i.e., testing releases that
aren't necessarily at a stage with criteria) more frequently.
I th
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 2:16 PM Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 26/11/2022 à 21:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > 5. We should produce snapshot binaries (i.e., testing releases that
> > aren't necessarily at a stage with criteria) more frequently. This is
> > especially helpful for platf
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 03:55:38PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 11/26/22 15:17, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > The last few years have been atypical, but even before then I think most
> > of us were in favor of more frequent major releases.
>
> Yes, I think that would be a very good idea,
Le 26/11/2022 à 21:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
5. We should produce snapshot binaries (i.e., testing releases that
aren't necessarily at a stage with criteria) more frequently. This is
especially helpful for platform-specific bugs so we can ask the
reporter if they can reproduce wit
On 11/26/22 15:17, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
The last few years have been atypical, but even before then I think most
of us were in favor of more frequent major releases.
Yes, I think that would be a very good idea, though I do not know how
much time I'll have to devote to LyX. It seems likely I'
The last few years have been atypical, but even before then I think most
of us were in favor of more frequent major releases. I'm not going to
spend much time on this type of long-run goal, but I'm starting to think
about how to at least crawl towards it. Here are a few thoughts in no
particular or
14 matches
Mail list logo
