Re: BOOST_REGEX_NARROW_INSTANTIATE

2003-10-30 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | ;-) In that case I need do nothing at all. Boost is getting ready > | to release 1.31.0 which will presumably make its way magically > | into LyX within hours if not minutes of the release. > > I already have the lyx tr

Re: BOOST_REGEX_NARROW_INSTANTIATE

2003-10-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | ;-) In that case I need do nothing at all. Boost is getting ready to | release 1.31.0 which will presumably make its way magically into LyX | within hours if not minutes of the release. I already have the lyx tree with the new boost ready it only

Re: BOOST_REGEX_NARROW_INSTANTIATE

2003-10-30 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> I was trying to get Ronald to compile LyX 1.3.x against a > Angus> snapshot of the boost tree. I could do so fine, but I was > using Angus> 1.3.x cvs and he was using the 1.3.3 release and we got > Angus> confused. I'll get back to it. > > Well, I have put the

Re: BOOST_REGEX_NARROW_INSTANTIATE

2003-10-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> I was trying to get Ronald to compile LyX 1.3.x against a Angus> snapshot of the boost tree. I could do so fine, but I was using Angus> 1.3.x cvs and he was using the 1.3.3 release and we got Angus> confused. I'll get back to it. W

Re: BOOST_REGEX_NARROW_INSTANTIATE

2003-10-30 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> We ran into something of a brick wall I'm afraid. I'll try > and Angus> get back to it and resolve the problems. > > I thought your message was that the patch was not needed anymore > with newer bo

Re: BOOST_REGEX_NARROW_INSTANTIATE

2003-10-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> We ran into something of a brick wall I'm afraid. I'll try and Angus> get back to it and resolve the problems. I thought your message was that the patch was not needed anymore with newer boost? Did I misunderstand? JMarc

Re: BOOST_REGEX_NARROW_INSTANTIATE

2003-10-30 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Angus> Take your time. There's no rush ;-) > > So I think I am going to drop the patch for 1.4.0cvs and wait until > release is near. Thanks Angus. We ran into something of a brick wall I'm afraid. I'll try and get back to it and resolve the problems. -- Angus

Re: BOOST_REGEX_NARROW_INSTANTIATE

2003-10-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> As before, I'd be interested to see whether you still need to Angus> define the BOOST_REGEX_NARROW_INSTANTIATE flag when you compile Angus> with gcc 2.95. Either way, I'll tell th

Re: BOOST_REGEX_NARROW_INSTANTIATE

2003-10-15 Thread Angus Leeming
interested to see whether you still need to define the BOOST_REGEX_NARROW_INSTANTIATE flag when you compile with gcc 2.95. Either way, I'll tell the library maintainer and we can just forget about this in the future. Take your time. There's no rush ;-) Angus Index: src/BoostFormat.h ===

BOOST_REGEX_NARROW_INSTANTIATE

2003-10-14 Thread Angus Leeming
themselves, packaged for use by lyx at http://www.devel.lyx.org/~leeming/boost-14Oct.tar.bz2 It's 640kB in size, expanding to 9MB. I wonder if you could try them out and see if you still need to define BOOST_REGEX_NARROW_INSTANTIATE explicitly? These are the necessary steps: $ (c