On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:43:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I would propose this.
For archival purposes, note that the patch was committed at e35110ea.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Le 18/07/2016 à 23:54, Richard Heck a écrit :
I would propose this.
Seems reasonable.
So shall I commit? What did your earlier patch do?
I do have some general questions about the way labelfont_ is set in
InsetArgument. It seems to get reset (along with a lot of other
private variables) eve
On 07/18/2016 02:43 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 18/07/2016 18:53, Richard Heck a écrit :
>> On 07/18/2016 06:26 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
>>> I've attached a MWE in which a flex inset is defined in a local layout
>>> (and validates). However, as soon as I try to insert the argument LyX
>>>
Le 18/07/2016 18:53, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 07/18/2016 06:26 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
I've attached a MWE in which a flex inset is defined in a local layout
(and validates). However, as soon as I try to insert the argument LyX
generates the assertion in the attached png. It seems to be the u
On 07/18/2016 06:26 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> I've attached a MWE in which a flex inset is defined in a local layout
> (and validates). However, as soon as I try to insert the argument LyX
> generates the assertion in the attached png. It seems to be the use of
> Color in the LabelFont specificat
I've attached a MWE in which a flex inset is defined in a local layout
(and validates). However, as soon as I try to insert the argument LyX
generates the assertion in the attached png. It seems to be the use of
Color in the LabelFont specification in Argument 1 that is the problem.
Family, Ser
